- 22 Nov, 2016 7 commits
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
Use COFEs only for the recursive domain equation solver
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- 21 Nov, 2016 13 commits
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
In particular, make sure we always try eassumption before reflexivity.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
The old name didn't make much sense. Also now we can have pure_False too.
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 20 Nov, 2016 7 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 19 Nov, 2016 6 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
That range includes tabs and new lines. Thanks Morten for spotting this problem.
-
- 17 Nov, 2016 7 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This way we can use set_solver to solve goals involving ∈.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Ralf Jung authored
This has bothered me repeatedly in proofs, now I finally got around to fix it at the source
-