- Feb 09, 2017
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Feb 01, 2017
-
-
Jacques-Henri Jourdan authored
Cancelable elements are a new way of proving local updates, by removing some cancellable element of the global state, provided that we own it and we are willing to lose this ownership. Identity-free elements are an auxiliary that is necessary to prove that [Some x] is cancelable. For technical reasons, these two notions are not defined exactly like what one might expect, but also take into account validity. Otherwise, an exclusive element would not be cancelable or idfree, which is rather confusing.
-
- Jan 30, 2017
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Jan 27, 2017
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- Jan 25, 2017
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
Also add "Local" to some Default Proof Using to keep them more contained
-
- Jan 05, 2017
- Jan 04, 2017
-
-
Jacques-Henri Jourdan authored
-
- Jan 03, 2017
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
This patch was created using find -name *.v | xargs -L 1 awk -i inplace '{from = 0} /^From/{ from = 1; ever_from = 1} { if (from == 0 && seen == 0 && ever_from == 1) { print "Set Default Proof Using \"Type*\"."; seen = 1 } }1 ' and some minor manual editing
-
- Dec 13, 2016
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- Dec 09, 2016
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- Nov 25, 2016
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- Nov 22, 2016
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
Use COFEs only for the recursive domain equation solver
-
- Oct 25, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Aug 14, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This is more consistent with the definition of the extension order, which is also defined in terms of an existential.
-
- Jul 21, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Also, remove some unused lemmas about agree.
-
- Jul 01, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This may save the need to seal off some stuff.
-
- May 31, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
be the same as
. This is a fairly intrusive change, but at least makes notations more consistent, and often shorter because fewer parentheses are needed. Note that viewshifts already had the same precedence as →.
-
- May 28, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Based on an idea and WIP commits of J-H. Jourdan: the core of a CMRA A is now a partial function A → option A. TODO: define sum CMRA TODO: remove one shot CMRA and define it in terms of sum
-
- May 25, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
- Make the carrier argument of the constructors for the canonical structures cofeT and cmraT explicit. This way we make sure the carrier is properly exposed, instead of some alias of the carrier. - Make derived constructions (such as discreteC and discreteR) notations instead of definitions. This is yet again to make sure that the carrier is properly exposed. - Turn DRA into a canonical structure (it used to be a type class). This fixes some issues, notably it fixes some broken rewrites in algebra/sts and it makes canonical structures work properly with dec_agree.
-
- Mar 15, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Mar 11, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
The only drawback is that we have to restrict iprod to finite types, but that is fine.
-
- Mar 10, 2016
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Thanks to Amin Timany for the suggestion.
-
- Mar 08, 2016
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- Mar 07, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
So, only use the type class for contractive functors.
-
Ralf Jung authored
Add both non-expansive and contractive functors, and bundle them for the general Iris instance as well as the global functor construction This allows us to move the \later in the user-defined functor to any place we want. In particular, we can now have "\later (iProp -> iProp)" in the ghost CMRA.
-
- Mar 06, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Since functor instances are just used as combinators, there is really no need for functors that are not contractive.
-
- Mar 02, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This cleans up some ad-hoc stuff and prepares for a generalization of saved propositions.
-
- Mar 01, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Feb 29, 2016
- Feb 26, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
It now also contains a non-expansiveness proof.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
I have simplified the following CMRA axioms: cmra_unit_preservingN n x y : x ≼{n} y → unit x ≼{n} unit y; cmra_op_minus n x y : x ≼{n} y → x ⋅ y ⩪ x ≡{n}≡ y; By dropping off the step-index, so into: cmra_unit_preservingN x y : x ≼ y → unit x ≼ unit y; cmra_op_minus x y : x ≼ y → x ⋅ y ⩪ x ≡ y; The old axioms can be derived.
-
- Feb 25, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
The performance gain seems neglectable, unfortunatelly...
-
- Feb 24, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This way it behaves better for discrete CMRAs.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This better seals off their definition. Although it did not give much of a speedup, I think it is conceptually nicer.
-
- Feb 23, 2016
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- Feb 20, 2016
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-