It was a parameter but that wasn't of any use,
it was just making everything more noisy.

Sergey Bozhko authored 3 years ago and Björn Brandenburg committed 3 years ago

There are quite a few places where hypotheses about the task of a job are simply stated as equality (even though a proper predicate exists). This patch replaces the equalities with the predicate.

This way, an addition in external libraries
cannot shadow a definition in Prosa.

Sergey Bozhko authored 4 years ago and Björn Brandenburg committed 3 years ago

With some misc. cleanups and reorganization thrown in.

Remove the use of ideal uniprocessor schedules in a couple of places where
it's not actually required.

Also fix some coqdoc styling issues while at it.

Sergey Bozhko authored 3 years ago and Björn Brandenburg committed 3 years ago

A standard mechanism for enforcing sequentiality of job execution is to use a readiness predicate that ensures that a job is not ready until all prior jobs of the same task are completed.

This patch introduces such predicates.

Pierre Roux authored 4 years ago and Björn Brandenburg committed 4 years ago

Completion sequences are defined (as arrival sequences) from an arrival sequence and a schedule.

The definition of busy interval can be generalized
to an arbitrary processor state model without
affecting other parts of the project.

add lemmas on consistency of backlogged jobs set

add notion of a non-clairvoyant readiness model

In anticipation of future reorganization efforts by Sophie, there's no
point in keeping the two kinds of definitions separate.

Move everything into the new namespace starting with 'prosa' rather
than the bland 'rt'.

The main restructuring thrust is nearing completion, so let's get rid
of the `restructuring` namespace.