Use coqdoc's header feature to make it easier to find key concepts and
improve/tweak a few comments.

Marco Perronet authored 5 years ago and Björn Brandenburg committed 5 years ago

... to get support for proofs started by `Next Obligation`.

1) rely on patch to actually patch the Makefile
2) move ineffective 'sed' hackery related to 'make validate'

Re 2), the sed script didn't actually modify the Makefile anyway
(unlear how long it has been ineffective), so let's just remove it.

Add support for compiling only classic Prosa, i.e., the inverse of
--without-classic.

No need to re-generate an unchanging file from scratch.

It's faster to just compile the new stuff. For new developments,
that's sufficient.

This partially addresses #54.

The mathcomp coqdoc documentation is now at:

   https://math-comp.github.io/htmldoc/

Tweak our Makefile accordingly.

Maxime Lesourd authored 5 years ago and Björn Brandenburg committed 5 years ago

- Added unfolding lemmas to basic_facts/ideal
- Fixed proofs depending on the previous definition using unfolding lemmas

The changes follow the discussion in Paris.

As discussed in #57.

As discussed at the RT-PROOFS meeting in Paris, proof terms should not
have a name so that we don't actually directly depend on them in
proofs. This patch removes the explicit name of the proof term in the
readiness type class and introduces an equivalent lemma.

If there are breaking changes coming in ssreflect, it would be nice to
know early.

This avoids the need to use @-notation when establishing platform
properties (e.g., in facts about ideal schedules).

Thanks to Maxime for the suggestion.

Also switch how this is patched into the Makefile while we're at it.