Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 82045899 authored by Björn Brandenburg's avatar Björn Brandenburg
Browse files

add READMEs to results folders

parent d1b319e6
No related branches found
No related tags found
1 merge request!77Superficial Results/Analysis Cleanup and Documentation Improvements
Pipeline #22254 passed with warnings
# High-Level Results about Earliest-Deadline First (EDF) Scheduling
This folder collects the main theorems in Prosa about EDF-scheduled systems. There are currently the following results available.
## EDF Optimality
As a case study, Prosa includes the proof that EDF is optimal w.r.t. meeting deadlines on an ideal uniprocessor.
**EDF optimality** on ideal uniprocessors: [optimality.v](optimality.v).
## Response-Time Bounds
On the more practical side, Prosa includes several **response-time bounds** for EDF. The proofs of these RTAs are based on abstract RTA.
The following RTAs all assume ideal uniprocessors and the basic Liu & Layland readiness model (i.e., jobs exhibit neither release jitter nor self-suspensions), but work for arbitrary arrival curves and arbitrary deadlines.
### (1) EDF RTA with Bounded Priority Inversions
The main result in [rta/bounded_pi.v](rta/bounded_pi.v) provides a general response-time bound assuming a bound on priority inversion (for whatever reason) is known.
### (2) EDF RTA with Bounded Non-Preemptive Segments
The main theorem in [rta/bounded_nps.v](rta/bounded_nps.v) provides a refinement of (1) based on the more specific assumption that priority inversions are caused by lower-priority non-preemptive jobs with bounded non-preemptive segment lengths.
### (3) EDF RTA for Fully Preemptive Jobs
The RTA provided in [rta/fully_preemptive.v](rta/fully_preemptive.v) applies (2) to the commonly assumed case of fully preemptive tasks (i.e., the complete absence of non-preemptive segments), which matches the classic Liu & Layland model.
### (4) EDF RTA for Fully Non-Preemptive Jobs
The file [rta/fully_nonpreemptive.v](rta/fully_nonpreemptive.v) provides a refinement of (2) for the case in which each job forms a single non-preemptive segment, i.e., where in-progress jobs execute with run-to-completion semantics and cannot be preempted at all.
### (5) EDF RTA for Floating Non-Preemptive Sections
The file [rta/floating_nonpreemptive.v](rta/floating_nonpreemptive.v) provides an RTA based on (2) for tasks that execute mostly preemptively, but that may also exhibit some non-preemptive segments (of bounded length) at unpredictable times.
### (6) EDF RTA for Limited-Preemptive Tasks
The file [rta/limited_preemptive.v](rta/limited_preemptive.v) provides an RTA based on (2) for tasks that consist of a sequence of non-preemptive segments, separated by fixed preemption points.
# High-Level Results about Fixed-Priority (FP) Scheduling
This folder collects the main theorems in Prosa about FP-scheduled systems. There are currently the following results available.
## Response-Time Bounds
Prosa includes several **response-time bounds** for FP scheduling. The proofs of these RTAs are based on abstract RTA.
### (1) FP RTA with Bounded Priority Inversions
The main result in [rta/bounded_pi.v](rta/bounded_pi.v) provides a general response-time bound assuming a bound on priority inversion (for whatever reason) is known.
### (2) FP RTA with Bounded Non-Preemptive Segments
The main theorem in [rta/bounded_nps.v](rta/bounded_nps.v) provides a refinement of (1) based on the more specific assumption that priority inversions are caused by lower-priority non-preemptive jobs with bounded non-preemptive segment lengths.
### (3) FP RTA for Fully Preemptive Jobs
The RTA provided in [rta/fully_preemptive.v](rta/fully_preemptive.v) applies (2) to the commonly assumed case of fully preemptive tasks (i.e., the complete absence of non-preemptive segments), which matches the classic Liu & Layland model.
### (4) FP RTA for Fully Non-Preemptive Jobs
The file [rta/fully_nonpreemptive.v](rta/fully_nonpreemptive.v) provides a refinement of (2) for the case in which each job forms a single non-preemptive segment, i.e., where in-progress jobs execute with run-to-completion semantics and cannot be preempted at all.
### (5) FP RTA for Floating Non-Preemptive Sections
The file [rta/floating_nonpreemptive.v](rta/floating_nonpreemptive.v) provides an RTA based on (2) for tasks that execute mostly preemptively, but that may also exhibit some non-preemptive segments (of bounded length) at unpredictable times.
### (6) FP RTA for Limited-Preemptive Tasks
The file [rta/limited_preemptive.v](rta/limited_preemptive.v) provides an RTA based on (2) for tasks that consist of a sequence of non-preemptive segments, separated by fixed preemption points.
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment