Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
P
PROSA - Formally Proven Schedulability Analysis
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Terms and privacy
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
RT-PROOFS
PROSA - Formally Proven Schedulability Analysis
Commits
acc353bd
Commit
acc353bd
authored
3 years ago
by
Kimaya Bedarkar
Committed by
Björn Brandenburg
3 years ago
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
addition to basic facts
parent
0727d647
No related branches found
Branches containing commit
No related tags found
Tags containing commit
1 merge request
!168
addition to basic facts
Pipeline
#56309
passed with warnings
3 years ago
Stage: build
Stage: process
Changes
1
Pipelines
2
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
analysis/facts/behavior/arrivals.v
+6
-3
6 additions, 3 deletions
analysis/facts/behavior/arrivals.v
with
6 additions
and
3 deletions
analysis/facts/behavior/arrivals.v
+
6
−
3
View file @
acc353bd
...
...
@@ -118,9 +118,12 @@ Section Arrived.
End
Arrived
.
(** We add the above lemma into a "Hint Database" basic_facts, so Coq
will be able to apply it automatically. *)
Global
Hint
Resolve
valid_schedule_implies_jobs_must_arrive_to_execute
:
basic_facts
.
(** We add some of the above lemmas to the "Hint Database"
[basic_facts], so the [auto] tactic will be able to use them. *)
Global
Hint
Resolve
valid_schedule_implies_jobs_must_arrive_to_execute
jobs_must_arrive_to_be_ready
:
basic_facts
.
(** In this section, we establish useful facts about arrival sequence prefixes. *)
Section
ArrivalSequencePrefix
.
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment