- Feb 17, 2020
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This closes issue #49.
-
- Nov 11, 2019
-
-
Simon Friis Vindum authored
-
- Sep 19, 2019
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
For example, change `(!! i)` into `(.!! x)` so that `!!` can also be used as a prefix, as done in VST for example. This closes issue #42. I have used the `sed` script below. This script took care of nearly all uses apart from a few occurrences where a space was missing, e.g. `(,foo)`. In this case, `coqc` will just fail, allowing one to patch up things manually. The script is slightly too eager on Iris developments, where it also replaces `($ ...)` introduction patterns. When porting Iris developments you thus may want to remove the line for `$`. ``` sed ' s/(= /(.= /g; s/ =)/ =.)/g; s/(≠ /(.≠ /g; s/ ≠)/ ≠.)/g; s/(≡ /(.≡ /g; s/ ≡)/ ≡.)/g; s/(≢ /(.≢ /g; s/ ≢)/ ≢.)/g; s/(∧ /(.∧ /g; s/ ∧)/ ∧.)/g; s/(∨ /(.∨ /g; s/ ∨)/ ∨.)/g; s/(
/(. /g; s/ )/ .)/g; s/(→ /(.→ /g; s/ →)/ →.)/g; s/($ /(.$ /g; s/(∘ /(.∘ /g; s/ ∘)/ ∘.)/g; s/(, /(., /g; s/ ,)/ ,.)/g; s/(∘ /(.∘ /g; s/ ∘)/ ∘.)/g; s/(∪ /(.∪ /g; s/ ∪)/ ∪.)/g; s/(⊎ /(.⊎ /g; s/ ⊎)/ ⊎.)/g; s/(∩ /(.∩ /g; s/ ∩)/ ∩.)/g; s/(∖ /(.∖ /g; s/ ∖)/ ∖.)/g; s/(⊆ /(.⊆ /g; s/ ⊆)/ ⊆.)/g; s/(⊈ /(.⊈ /g; s/ ⊈)/ ⊈.)/g; s/(⊂ /(.⊂ /g; s/ ⊂)/ ⊂.)/g; s/(⊄ /(.⊄ /g; s/ ⊄)/ ⊄.)/g; s/(∈ /(.∈ /g; s/ ∈)/ ∈.)/g; s/(∉ /(.∉ /g; s/ ∉)/ ∉.)/g; s/(≫= /(.≫= /g; s/ ≫=)/ ≫=.)/g; s/(!! /(.!! /g; s/ !!)/ !!.)/g; s/(⊑ /(.⊑ /g; s/ ⊑)/ ⊑.)/g; s/(⊓ /(.⊓ /g; s/ ⊓)/ ⊓.)/g; s/(⊔ /(.⊔ /g; s/ ⊔)/ ⊔.)/g; s/(:: /(.:: /g; s/ ::)/ ::.)/g; s/(++ /(.++ /g; s/ ++)/ ++.)/g; s/(≡ₚ /(.≡ₚ /g; s/ ≡ₚ)/ ≡ₚ.)/g; s/(≢ₚ /(.≢ₚ /g; s/ ≢ₚ)/ ≢ₚ.)/g; s/(::: /(.::: /g; s/ :::)/ :::.)/g; s/(+++ /(.+++ /g; s/ +++)/ +++.)/g; ' -i $(find -name "*.v") ```
-
- Jun 28, 2019
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Jun 25, 2019
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This closes issue #36.
-
- Jun 20, 2019
- Apr 24, 2019
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Mar 03, 2019
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
- The class `Infinite A` is now defined as having a function `fresh : list A → A`, that given a list `xs`, gives an element `x ∉ xs`. - For most types this `fresh` function has a sensible computable behavior, for example: + For numbers, it yields one added to the maximal element in `xs`. + For strings, it yields the first string representation of a number that is not in `xs`. - For any type `C` of finite sets with elements of infinite type `A`, we lift the fresh function to `C → A`. As a consequence: - It is now possible to pick fresh elements from _any_ finite set and from _any_ list with elements of an infinite type. Before it was only possible for specific finite sets, e.g. `gset`, `pset`, ... - It makes the code more uniform. There was a lot of overlap between having a `Fresh` and an `Infinite` instance. This got unified.
-
- Feb 23, 2019
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Feb 22, 2019
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- Feb 20, 2019
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Get rid of using `Collection` and favor `set` everywhere. Also, prefer conversion functions that are called `X_to_Y`. The following sed script performs most of the renaming, with the exception of: - `set`, which has been renamed into `propset`. I couldn't do this rename using `sed` since it's too context sensitive. - There was a spurious rename of `Vec.of_list`, which I correctly manually. - Updating some section names and comments. ``` sed ' s/SimpleCollection/SemiSet/g; s/FinCollection/FinSet/g; s/CollectionMonad/MonadSet/g; s/Collection/Set\_/g; s/collection\_simple/set\_semi\_set/g; s/fin\_collection/fin\_set/g; s/collection\_monad\_simple/monad\_set\_semi\_set/g; s/collection\_equiv/set\_equiv/g; s/\bbset/boolset/g; s/mkBSet/BoolSet/g; s/mkSet/PropSet/g; s/set\_equivalence/set\_equiv\_equivalence/g; s/collection\_subseteq/set\_subseteq/g; s/collection\_disjoint/set\_disjoint/g; s/collection\_fold/set\_fold/g; s/collection\_map/set\_map/g; s/collection\_size/set\_size/g; s/collection\_filter/set\_filter/g; s/collection\_guard/set\_guard/g; s/collection\_choose/set\_choose/g; s/collection\_ind/set\_ind/g; s/collection\_wf/set\_wf/g; s/map\_to\_collection/map\_to\_set/g; s/map\_of\_collection/set\_to\_map/g; s/map\_of\_list/list\_to\_map/g; s/map\_of\_to_list/list\_to\_map\_to\_list/g; s/map\_to\_of\_list/map\_to\_list\_to\_map/g; s/\bof\_list/list\_to\_set/g; s/\bof\_option/option\_to\_set/g; s/elem\_of\_of\_list/elem\_of\_list\_to\_set/g; s/elem\_of\_of\_option/elem\_of\_option\_to\_set/g; s/collection\_not\_subset\_inv/set\_not\_subset\_inv/g; s/seq\_set/set\_seq/g; s/collections/sets/g; s/collection/set/g; ' -i $(find -name "*.v") ```
-
- Jan 29, 2019
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Jan 23, 2019
-
-
Maxime Dénès authored
This is in preparation for coq/coq#9274.
-
- Jun 20, 2018
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- Jun 18, 2018
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- Apr 09, 2018
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Apr 05, 2018
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This followed from discussions in https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/FP/iris-coq/merge_requests/134
-
- Mar 28, 2018
-
-
Dan Frumin authored
-
- Nov 20, 2017
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This one works for setoid rewriting under binders.
-
- Nov 09, 2017
-
-
Johannes Kloos authored
-
- Oct 28, 2017
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This way, we will be compabile with Iris's heap_lang, which puts ;; at level 100.
-
- Oct 27, 2017
-
-
Jacques-Henri Jourdan authored
-
- Sep 21, 2017
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This allows for more control over `Hint Mode`.
-
- Sep 17, 2017
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This provides significant robustness against looping type class search. As a consequence, at many places throughout the library we had to add additional typing information to lemmas. This was to be expected, since most of the old lemmas were ambiguous. For example: Section fin_collection. Context `{FinCollection A C}. size_singleton (x : A) : size {[ x ]} = 1. In this case, the lemma does not tell us which `FinCollection` with elements `A` we are talking about. So, `{[ x ]}` could not only refer to the singleton operation of the `FinCollection A C` in the section, but also to any other `FinCollection` in the development. To make this lemma unambigious, it should be written as: Lemma size_singleton (x : A) : size ({[ x ]} : C) = 1. In similar spirit, lemmas like the one below were also ambiguous: Lemma lookup_alter_None {A} (f : A → A) m i j : alter f i m !! j = None
m !! j = None. It is not clear which finite map implementation we are talking about. To make this lemma unambigious, it should be written as: Lemma lookup_alter_None {A} (f : A → A) (m : M A) i j : alter f i m !! j = None m !! j = None. That is, we have to specify the type of `m`.
-
- Sep 08, 2017
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
See also Coq bug #5712.
-
- Sep 06, 2017
-
-
Dan Frumin authored
-
- Apr 01, 2017
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This is needed to use coq-stdpp in developments with -type-in-type as set_unfold will otherwise unify with any hyp, causing the set_solver tactic to break.
-
- Mar 15, 2017
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-