I needed a lemma like this a couple of times. The proof ends up being quite long.
I can also add a symmetric case big_sepM2_union_inv_r
, but I am not sure if there is a better way of proving it than copy-pasting the proof for the _l
case.
I needed a lemma like this a couple of times. The proof ends up being quite long.
I can also add a symmetric case big_sepM2_union_inv_r
, but I am not sure if there is a better way of proving it than copy-pasting the proof for the _l
case.