Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit eb77524e authored by Robbert Krebbers's avatar Robbert Krebbers
Browse files

Move sorting stuff to separate file.

parent 1804da3f
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
(** This file collects definitions and theorems on collections. Most
importantly, it implements some tactics to automatically solve goals involving
collections. *)
From stdpp Require Export base tactics orders.
From stdpp Require Export orders list.
Instance collection_equiv `{ElemOf A C} : Equiv C := λ X Y,
x, x X x Y.
......@@ -811,8 +811,7 @@ Section fresh.
Proof. induction 1; by constructor. Qed.
Lemma Forall_fresh_elem_of X xs x : Forall_fresh X xs x xs x X.
Proof.
intros HX; revert x; rewrite <-Forall_forall.
by induction HX; constructor.
intros HX; revert x; rewrite <-Forall_forall. by induction HX; constructor.
Qed.
Lemma Forall_fresh_alt X xs :
Forall_fresh X xs NoDup xs x, x xs x X.
......
......@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ finite maps and collects some theory on it. Most importantly, it proves useful
induction principles for finite maps and implements the tactic
[simplify_map_eq] to simplify goals involving finite maps. *)
From Coq Require Import Permutation.
From stdpp Require Export relations vector orders.
From stdpp Require Export relations orders vector.
(** * Axiomatization of finite maps *)
(** We require Leibniz equality to be extensional on finite maps. This of
......
(* Copyright (c) 2012-2015, Robbert Krebbers. *)
(* This file is distributed under the terms of the BSD license. *)
(** This file collects common properties of pre-orders and semi lattices. This
theory will mainly be used for the theory on collections and finite maps. *)
From Coq Require Export Sorted.
From stdpp Require Export tactics list.
(** * Arbitrary pre-, parial and total orders *)
(** Properties about arbitrary pre-, partial, and total orders. We do not use
the relation [⊆] because we often have multiple orders on the same structure *)
From stdpp Require Export tactics.
Section orders.
Context {A} {R : relation A}.
Implicit Types X Y : A.
......@@ -104,203 +100,3 @@ Ltac simplify_order := repeat
assert (R x z) by (by trans y)
end
end.
(** * Sorting *)
(** Merge sort. Adapted from the implementation of Hugo Herbelin in the Coq
standard library, but without using the module system. *)
Section merge_sort.
Context {A} (R : relation A) `{ x y, Decision (R x y)}.
Fixpoint list_merge (l1 : list A) : list A list A :=
fix list_merge_aux l2 :=
match l1, l2 with
| [], _ => l2
| _, [] => l1
| x1 :: l1, x2 :: l2 =>
if decide_rel R x1 x2 then x1 :: list_merge l1 (x2 :: l2)
else x2 :: list_merge_aux l2
end.
Global Arguments list_merge !_ !_ /.
Local Notation stack := (list (option (list A))).
Fixpoint merge_list_to_stack (st : stack) (l : list A) : stack :=
match st with
| [] => [Some l]
| None :: st => Some l :: st
| Some l' :: st => None :: merge_list_to_stack st (list_merge l' l)
end.
Fixpoint merge_stack (st : stack) : list A :=
match st with
| [] => []
| None :: st => merge_stack st
| Some l :: st => list_merge l (merge_stack st)
end.
Fixpoint merge_sort_aux (st : stack) (l : list A) : list A :=
match l with
| [] => merge_stack st
| x :: l => merge_sort_aux (merge_list_to_stack st [x]) l
end.
Definition merge_sort : list A list A := merge_sort_aux [].
End merge_sort.
(** ** Properties of the [Sorted] and [StronglySorted] predicate *)
Section sorted.
Context {A} (R : relation A).
Lemma Sorted_StronglySorted `{!Transitive R} l :
Sorted R l StronglySorted R l.
Proof. by apply Sorted.Sorted_StronglySorted. Qed.
Lemma StronglySorted_unique `{!AntiSymm (=) R} l1 l2 :
StronglySorted R l1 StronglySorted R l2 l1 l2 l1 = l2.
Proof.
intros Hl1; revert l2. induction Hl1 as [|x1 l1 ? IH Hx1]; intros l2 Hl2 E.
{ symmetry. by apply Permutation_nil. }
destruct Hl2 as [|x2 l2 ? Hx2].
{ by apply Permutation_nil in E. }
assert (x1 = x2); subst.
{ rewrite Forall_forall in Hx1, Hx2.
assert (x2 x1 :: l1) as Hx2' by (by rewrite E; left).
assert (x1 x2 :: l2) as Hx1' by (by rewrite <-E; left).
inversion Hx1'; inversion Hx2'; simplify_eq; auto. }
f_equal. by apply IH, (inj (x2 ::)).
Qed.
Lemma Sorted_unique `{!Transitive R, !AntiSymm (=) R} l1 l2 :
Sorted R l1 Sorted R l2 l1 l2 l1 = l2.
Proof. auto using StronglySorted_unique, Sorted_StronglySorted. Qed.
Global Instance HdRel_dec x `{ y, Decision (R x y)} l :
Decision (HdRel R x l).
Proof.
refine
match l with
| [] => left _
| y :: l => cast_if (decide (R x y))
end; abstract first [by constructor | by inversion 1].
Defined.
Global Instance Sorted_dec `{ x y, Decision (R x y)} : l,
Decision (Sorted R l).
Proof.
refine
(fix go l :=
match l return Decision (Sorted R l) with
| [] => left _
| x :: l => cast_if_and (decide (HdRel R x l)) (go l)
end); clear go; abstract first [by constructor | by inversion 1].
Defined.
Global Instance StronglySorted_dec `{ x y, Decision (R x y)} : l,
Decision (StronglySorted R l).
Proof.
refine
(fix go l :=
match l return Decision (StronglySorted R l) with
| [] => left _
| x :: l => cast_if_and (decide (Forall (R x) l)) (go l)
end); clear go; abstract first [by constructor | by inversion 1].
Defined.
Context {B} (f : A B).
Lemma HdRel_fmap (R1 : relation A) (R2 : relation B) x l :
( y, R1 x y R2 (f x) (f y)) HdRel R1 x l HdRel R2 (f x) (f <$> l).
Proof. destruct 2; constructor; auto. Qed.
Lemma Sorted_fmap (R1 : relation A) (R2 : relation B) l :
( x y, R1 x y R2 (f x) (f y)) Sorted R1 l Sorted R2 (f <$> l).
Proof. induction 2; simpl; constructor; eauto using HdRel_fmap. Qed.
Lemma StronglySorted_fmap (R1 : relation A) (R2 : relation B) l :
( x y, R1 x y R2 (f x) (f y))
StronglySorted R1 l StronglySorted R2 (f <$> l).
Proof.
induction 2; csimpl; constructor;
rewrite ?Forall_fmap; eauto using Forall_impl.
Qed.
End sorted.
(** ** Correctness of merge sort *)
Section merge_sort_correct.
Context {A} (R : relation A) `{ x y, Decision (R x y)} `{!Total R}.
Lemma list_merge_cons x1 x2 l1 l2 :
list_merge R (x1 :: l1) (x2 :: l2) =
if decide (R x1 x2) then x1 :: list_merge R l1 (x2 :: l2)
else x2 :: list_merge R (x1 :: l1) l2.
Proof. done. Qed.
Lemma HdRel_list_merge x l1 l2 :
HdRel R x l1 HdRel R x l2 HdRel R x (list_merge R l1 l2).
Proof.
destruct 1 as [|x1 l1 IH1], 1 as [|x2 l2 IH2];
rewrite ?list_merge_cons; simpl; repeat case_decide; auto.
Qed.
Lemma Sorted_list_merge l1 l2 :
Sorted R l1 Sorted R l2 Sorted R (list_merge R l1 l2).
Proof.
intros Hl1. revert l2. induction Hl1 as [|x1 l1 IH1];
induction 1 as [|x2 l2 IH2]; rewrite ?list_merge_cons; simpl;
repeat case_decide;
constructor; eauto using HdRel_list_merge, HdRel_cons, total_not.
Qed.
Lemma merge_Permutation l1 l2 : list_merge R l1 l2 l1 ++ l2.
Proof.
revert l2. induction l1 as [|x1 l1 IH1]; intros l2;
induction l2 as [|x2 l2 IH2]; rewrite ?list_merge_cons; simpl;
repeat case_decide; auto.
- by rewrite (right_id_L [] (++)).
- by rewrite IH2, Permutation_middle.
Qed.
Local Notation stack := (list (option (list A))).
Inductive merge_stack_Sorted : stack Prop :=
| merge_stack_Sorted_nil : merge_stack_Sorted []
| merge_stack_Sorted_cons_None st :
merge_stack_Sorted st merge_stack_Sorted (None :: st)
| merge_stack_Sorted_cons_Some l st :
Sorted R l merge_stack_Sorted st merge_stack_Sorted (Some l :: st).
Fixpoint merge_stack_flatten (st : stack) : list A :=
match st with
| [] => []
| None :: st => merge_stack_flatten st
| Some l :: st => l ++ merge_stack_flatten st
end.
Lemma Sorted_merge_list_to_stack st l :
merge_stack_Sorted st Sorted R l
merge_stack_Sorted (merge_list_to_stack R st l).
Proof.
intros Hst. revert l.
induction Hst; repeat constructor; naive_solver auto using Sorted_list_merge.
Qed.
Lemma merge_list_to_stack_Permutation st l :
merge_stack_flatten (merge_list_to_stack R st l)
l ++ merge_stack_flatten st.
Proof.
revert l. induction st as [|[l'|] st IH]; intros l; simpl; auto.
by rewrite IH, merge_Permutation, (assoc_L _), (comm (++) l).
Qed.
Lemma Sorted_merge_stack st :
merge_stack_Sorted st Sorted R (merge_stack R st).
Proof. induction 1; simpl; auto using Sorted_list_merge. Qed.
Lemma merge_stack_Permutation st : merge_stack R st merge_stack_flatten st.
Proof.
induction st as [|[] ? IH]; intros; simpl; auto.
by rewrite merge_Permutation, IH.
Qed.
Lemma Sorted_merge_sort_aux st l :
merge_stack_Sorted st Sorted R (merge_sort_aux R st l).
Proof.
revert st. induction l; simpl;
auto using Sorted_merge_stack, Sorted_merge_list_to_stack.
Qed.
Lemma merge_sort_aux_Permutation st l :
merge_sort_aux R st l merge_stack_flatten st ++ l.
Proof.
revert st. induction l as [|?? IH]; simpl; intros.
- by rewrite (right_id_L [] (++)), merge_stack_Permutation.
- rewrite IH, merge_list_to_stack_Permutation; simpl.
by rewrite Permutation_middle.
Qed.
Lemma Sorted_merge_sort l : Sorted R (merge_sort R l).
Proof. apply Sorted_merge_sort_aux. by constructor. Qed.
Lemma merge_sort_Permutation l : merge_sort R l l.
Proof. unfold merge_sort. by rewrite merge_sort_aux_Permutation. Qed.
Lemma StronglySorted_merge_sort `{!Transitive R} l :
StronglySorted R (merge_sort R l).
Proof. auto using Sorted_StronglySorted, Sorted_merge_sort. Qed.
End merge_sort_correct.
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment