Renamed `app_cons_eq_inv_{l,r}`, and added derived versions for `prefix/suffix`
All threads resolved!
All threads resolved!
Renamed the lemmas app_cons_eq_inv_{l,r}
, to elem_of_app_cons_inv_{l,r}
, to be more descriptive and consistent with existing lemmas.
Additionally, derived versions for prefix/suffix
, as they recall some non-immediate properties of the relations on similar list structures.
Edited by Jonas Kastberg
Merge request reports
Activity
- Resolved by Jonas Kastberg
mentioned in merge request !363 (merged)
- Resolved by Jonas Kastberg
added 1 commit
- 2a3b29da - Made proof of [prefix_app_inv] in line with that of [suffix_app_inv]
Can you rebase, add the lemma for postfix, and put them in the same style as the ones in !363 (merged).
added 28 commits
-
2a3b29da...f71300ea - 26 commits from branch
iris:master
- fb27a857 - Added useful lemmas for [prefix]
- 22e7199d - Made proof of [prefix_app_inv] in line with that of [suffix_app_inv]
-
2a3b29da...f71300ea - 26 commits from branch
added 1 commit
- 844a0f13 - Added suffix variant, renamed lemmas, proved in terms of existing
- Resolved by Jonas Kastberg
- Resolved by Jonas Kastberg
- Resolved by Jonas Kastberg
added 1 commit
- 346342ba - Another name change - Also for dependent lemmas
@iris-users This MR is a breaking change if you already rely on the lemmas from !363 (merged) (merged 5 days ago).
mentioned in commit 907a40ef
Thanks @jihgfee for the fixes! Merged.
Please register or sign in to reply