Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects

make solve_ndisj more powerful

Merged Ralf Jung requested to merge ralf/solve_ndisj into master

Fixes #34 (closed).

Merge request reports

Loading
Loading

Activity

Filter activity
  • Approvals
  • Assignees & reviewers
  • Comments (from bots)
  • Comments (from users)
  • Commits & branches
  • Edits
  • Labels
  • Lock status
  • Mentions
  • Merge request status
  • Tracking
  • Ralf Jung added 1 commit

    added 1 commit

    • 248a89ff - more generalization of lemmas and a few comments for [solve_ndisj]

    Compare with previous version

  • Ralf Jung added 1 commit

    added 1 commit

    • c081e1b7 - more generalization of lemmas and a few comments for [solve_ndisj]

    Compare with previous version

  • Author Owner

    I also found even more lemmas in "namespaces" that apply to all sets, and moved them over as well.

  • Ralf Jung added 1 commit

    added 1 commit

    Compare with previous version

  • Ralf Jung resolved all discussions

    resolved all discussions

  • Would be good to see if this impacts timing of iris, lambdarust, and iris-examples.

  • Author Owner

    Well we can see that after landing.

  • Sure, but could you make sure we record timing info that includes just this change?

  • Author Owner

    I guess I can try... I need scripts for this stuff.^^

  • Author Owner

    But I can only really do that after you land it so that I know which std++ revisions to use.

  • But do we have timing information from just before this change? Or does it include random other stuff?

  • Author Owner

    Once I know what "just before this change" is, I can make sure that we have that timing information. But that is only determined after landing the change. :)

    Edited by Ralf Jung
  • Oh, maybe I was not clear, but with !75 (comment 37450) I meant you can merge.

  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Please register or sign in to reply
    Loading