Added two proper instances with permutations
All threads resolved!
All threads resolved!
These are two Proper instances I found useful in my development. My original proofs use move => /Forall_cons[??]
instead of inversion, but stdpp does not seem to use ssreflect and intros [??]%Forall_cons
does not work for reasons I don't understand. So please let me know if you know how to do the prrof for Forall_proper_perm
without inversion.
Merge request reports
Activity
Filter activity
- Resolved by Michael Sammler
- Resolved by Michael Sammler
- Resolved by Robbert Krebbers
- Resolved by Michael Sammler
- Resolved by Michael Sammler
- Resolved by Michael Sammler
mentioned in commit 3c3ba0dd
Please register or sign in to reply