Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
I
Iris
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package Registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Terraform modules
Monitor
Incidents
Service Desk
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Terms and privacy
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Matthieu Sozeau
Iris
Commits
7884512b
Commit
7884512b
authored
9 years ago
by
Ralf Jung
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
make *_ctx more opaque; use another opportunity for sep_split
parent
88638cda
No related branches found
Branches containing commit
No related tags found
Tags containing commit
No related merge requests found
Changes
4
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
4 changed files
heap_lang/heap.v
+17
-16
17 additions, 16 deletions
heap_lang/heap.v
heap_lang/spawn.v
+2
-3
2 additions, 3 deletions
heap_lang/spawn.v
program_logic/auth.v
+18
-16
18 additions, 16 deletions
program_logic/auth.v
program_logic/sts.v
+31
-31
31 additions, 31 deletions
program_logic/sts.v
with
68 additions
and
66 deletions
heap_lang/heap.v
+
17
−
16
View file @
7884512b
...
...
@@ -21,17 +21,22 @@ Definition to_heap : state → heapR := fmap (λ v, Frac 1 (DecAgree v)).
Definition
of_heap
:
heapR
→
state
:=
omap
(
mbind
(
maybe
DecAgree
∘
snd
)
∘
maybe2
Frac
)
.
(* heap_mapsto is defined strongly opaquely, to prevent unification from
matching it against other forms of ownership. *)
Definition
heap_mapsto
`{
heapG
Σ
}
(
l
:
loc
)(
q
:
Qp
)
(
v
:
val
)
:
iPropG
heap_lang
Σ
:=
auth_own
heap_name
{[
l
:=
Frac
q
(
DecAgree
v
)
]}
.
Typeclasses
Opaque
heap_mapsto
.
Definition
heap_inv
`{
i
:
heapG
Σ
}
(
h
:
heapR
)
:
iPropG
heap_lang
Σ
:=
ownP
(
of_heap
h
)
.
Definition
heap_ctx
`{
i
:
heapG
Σ
}
(
N
:
namespace
)
:
iPropG
heap_lang
Σ
:=
auth_ctx
heap_name
N
heap_inv
.
Section
definitions
.
Context
`{
i
:
heapG
Σ
}
.
Definition
heap_mapsto
(
l
:
loc
)
(
q
:
Qp
)
(
v
:
val
)
:
iPropG
heap_lang
Σ
:=
auth_own
heap_name
{[
l
:=
Frac
q
(
DecAgree
v
)
]}
.
Definition
heap_inv
(
h
:
heapR
)
:
iPropG
heap_lang
Σ
:=
ownP
(
of_heap
h
)
.
Definition
heap_ctx
(
N
:
namespace
)
:
iPropG
heap_lang
Σ
:=
auth_ctx
heap_name
N
heap_inv
.
Global
Instance
heap_inv_proper
:
Proper
((
≡
)
==>
(
≡
))
heap_inv
.
Proof
.
solve_proper
.
Qed
.
Global
Instance
heap_ctx_always_stable
N
:
AlwaysStable
(
heap_ctx
N
)
.
Proof
.
apply
_
.
Qed
.
End
definitions
.
Typeclasses
Opaque
heap_ctx
heap_mapsto
.
Notation
"l ↦{ q } v"
:=
(
heap_mapsto
l
q
v
)
(
at
level
20
,
q
at
level
50
,
format
"l ↦{ q } v"
)
:
uPred_scope
.
...
...
@@ -99,7 +104,7 @@ Section heap.
apply
(
auth_alloc
(
ownP
∘
of_heap
)
N
E
(
to_heap
σ
));
last
done
.
apply
to_heap_valid
.
}
apply
pvs_mono
,
exist_elim
=>
γ
.
rewrite
-
(
exist_intro
(
HeapG
_
_
γ
));
apply
and_mono_r
.
rewrite
-
(
exist_intro
(
HeapG
_
_
γ
))
/
heap_ctx
;
apply
and_mono_r
.
rewrite
/
heap_mapsto
/
heap_name
.
induction
σ
as
[|
l
v
σ
Hl
IH
]
using
map_ind
.
{
rewrite
big_sepM_empty
;
apply
True_intro
.
}
...
...
@@ -112,10 +117,6 @@ Section heap.
Context
`{
heapG
Σ
}
.
(** Propers *)
Global
Instance
heap_inv_proper
:
Proper
((
≡
)
==>
(
≡
))
heap_inv
.
Proof
.
solve_proper
.
Qed
.
(** General properties of mapsto *)
Lemma
heap_mapsto_op_eq
l
q1
q2
v
:
(
l
↦
{
q1
}
v
★
l
↦
{
q2
}
v
)
%
I
≡
(
l
↦
{
q1
+
q2
}
v
)
%
I
.
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
heap_lang/spawn.v
+
2
−
3
View file @
7884512b
...
...
@@ -70,9 +70,8 @@ Proof.
cancel
[
l
↦
InjLV
#
0
]
%
I
.
apply
or_intro_l'
.
by
rewrite
const_equiv
.
}
rewrite
(
inv_alloc
N
)
//
!
pvs_frame_l
.
eapply
wp_strip_pvs
.
ewp
eapply
wp_fork
.
rewrite
[
heap_ctx
_]
always_sep_dup
[
inv
_
_]
always_sep_dup
.
rewrite
!
assoc
[(_
★
(
own
_
_))
%
I
]
comm
!
assoc
[(_
★
(
inv
_
_))
%
I
]
comm
.
rewrite
!
assoc
[(_
★
(_
-★
_))
%
I
]
comm
.
rewrite
-!
assoc
3
!
assoc
.
apply
sep_mono
.
-
wp_seq
.
rewrite
-!
assoc
.
eapply
wand_apply_l
;
[
done
..|]
.
sep_split
left
:
[_
-★
_;
inv
_
_;
own
_
_;
heap_ctx
_]
%
I
.
-
wp_seq
.
eapply
wand_apply_l
;
[
done
..|]
.
rewrite
/
join_handle
.
rewrite
const_equiv
//
left_id
-
(
exist_intro
γ
)
.
solve_sep_entails
.
-
wp_focus
(
f
_)
.
rewrite
wp_frame_r
wp_frame_l
.
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
program_logic/auth.v
+
18
−
16
View file @
7884512b
...
...
@@ -13,17 +13,26 @@ Instance authGF_inGF (A : cmraT) `{inGF Λ Σ (authGF A)}
`{
CMRAIdentity
A
,
CMRADiscrete
A
}
:
authG
Λ
Σ
A
.
Proof
.
split
;
try
apply
_
.
apply
:
inGF_inG
.
Qed
.
Definition
auth_own
`{
authG
Λ
Σ
A
}
(
γ
:
gname
)
(
a
:
A
)
:
iPropG
Λ
Σ
:=
own
γ
(
◯
a
)
.
Typeclasses
Opaque
auth_own
.
Section
definitions
.
Context
`{
authG
Λ
Σ
A
}
(
γ
:
gname
)
.
Definition
auth_own
(
a
:
A
)
:
iPropG
Λ
Σ
:=
own
γ
(
◯
a
)
.
Definition
auth_inv
(
φ
:
A
→
iPropG
Λ
Σ
)
:
iPropG
Λ
Σ
:=
(
∃
a
,
own
γ
(
●
a
)
★
φ
a
)
%
I
.
Definition
auth_ctx
(
N
:
namespace
)
(
φ
:
A
→
iPropG
Λ
Σ
)
:
iPropG
Λ
Σ
:=
inv
N
(
auth_inv
φ
)
.
Definition
auth_inv
`{
authG
Λ
Σ
A
}
(
γ
:
gname
)
(
φ
:
A
→
iPropG
Λ
Σ
)
:
iPropG
Λ
Σ
:=
(
∃
a
,
own
γ
(
●
a
)
★
φ
a
)
%
I
.
Definition
auth_ctx
`{
authG
Λ
Σ
A
}
(
γ
:
gname
)
(
N
:
namespace
)
(
φ
:
A
→
iPropG
Λ
Σ
)
:
iPropG
Λ
Σ
:=
inv
N
(
auth_inv
γ
φ
)
.
Global
Instance
auth_own_ne
n
:
Proper
(
dist
n
==>
dist
n
)
auth_own
.
Proof
.
solve_proper
.
Qed
.
Global
Instance
auth_own_proper
:
Proper
((
≡
)
==>
(
≡
))
auth_own
.
Proof
.
solve_proper
.
Qed
.
Global
Instance
auth_own_timeless
a
:
TimelessP
(
auth_own
a
)
.
Proof
.
apply
_
.
Qed
.
Global
Instance
auth_ctx_always_stable
N
φ
:
AlwaysStable
(
auth_ctx
N
φ
)
.
Proof
.
apply
_
.
Qed
.
End
definitions
.
Typeclasses
Opaque
auth_own
auth_ctx
.
Instance
:
Params
(
@
auth_inv
)
6
.
Instance
:
Params
(
@
auth_own
)
6
.
Instance
:
Params
(
@
auth_ctx
)
7
.
...
...
@@ -36,13 +45,6 @@ Section auth.
Implicit
Types
a
b
:
A
.
Implicit
Types
γ
:
gname
.
Global
Instance
auth_own_ne
n
γ
:
Proper
(
dist
n
==>
dist
n
)
(
auth_own
γ
)
.
Proof
.
solve_proper
.
Qed
.
Global
Instance
auth_own_proper
γ
:
Proper
((
≡
)
==>
(
≡
))
(
auth_own
γ
)
.
Proof
.
solve_proper
.
Qed
.
Global
Instance
auth_own_timeless
γ
a
:
TimelessP
(
auth_own
γ
a
)
.
Proof
.
rewrite
/
auth_own
.
apply
_
.
Qed
.
Lemma
auth_own_op
γ
a
b
:
auth_own
γ
(
a
⋅
b
)
≡
(
auth_own
γ
a
★
auth_own
γ
b
)
%
I
.
Proof
.
by
rewrite
/
auth_own
-
own_op
auth_frag_op
.
Qed
.
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
program_logic/sts.v
+
31
−
31
View file @
7884512b
...
...
@@ -13,21 +13,37 @@ Instance inGF_stsG sts `{inGF Λ Σ (stsGF sts)}
`{
Inhabited
(
sts
.
state
sts
)}
:
stsG
Λ
Σ
sts
.
Proof
.
split
;
try
apply
_
.
apply
:
inGF_inG
.
Qed
.
Definition
sts_ownS
`{
i
:
stsG
Λ
Σ
sts
}
(
γ
:
gname
)
(
S
:
sts
.
states
sts
)
(
T
:
sts
.
tokens
sts
)
:
iPropG
Λ
Σ
:=
own
γ
(
sts_frag
S
T
)
.
Definition
sts_own
`{
i
:
stsG
Λ
Σ
sts
}
(
γ
:
gname
)
(
s
:
sts
.
state
sts
)
(
T
:
sts
.
tokens
sts
)
:
iPropG
Λ
Σ
:=
own
γ
(
sts_frag_up
s
T
)
.
Typeclasses
Opaque
sts_own
sts_ownS
.
Definition
sts_inv
`{
i
:
stsG
Λ
Σ
sts
}
(
γ
:
gname
)
(
φ
:
sts
.
state
sts
→
iPropG
Λ
Σ
)
:
iPropG
Λ
Σ
:=
(
∃
s
,
own
γ
(
sts_auth
s
∅
)
★
φ
s
)
%
I
.
Definition
sts_ctx
`{
i
:
stsG
Λ
Σ
sts
}
(
γ
:
gname
)
(
N
:
namespace
)
(
φ
:
sts
.
state
sts
→
iPropG
Λ
Σ
)
:
iPropG
Λ
Σ
:=
inv
N
(
sts_inv
γ
φ
)
.
Section
definitions
.
Context
`{
i
:
stsG
Λ
Σ
sts
}
(
γ
:
gname
)
.
Definition
sts_ownS
(
S
:
sts
.
states
sts
)
(
T
:
sts
.
tokens
sts
)
:
iPropG
Λ
Σ
:=
own
γ
(
sts_frag
S
T
)
.
Definition
sts_own
(
s
:
sts
.
state
sts
)
(
T
:
sts
.
tokens
sts
)
:
iPropG
Λ
Σ
:=
own
γ
(
sts_frag_up
s
T
)
.
Definition
sts_inv
(
φ
:
sts
.
state
sts
→
iPropG
Λ
Σ
)
:
iPropG
Λ
Σ
:=
(
∃
s
,
own
γ
(
sts_auth
s
∅
)
★
φ
s
)
%
I
.
Definition
sts_ctx
(
N
:
namespace
)
(
φ
:
sts
.
state
sts
→
iPropG
Λ
Σ
)
:
iPropG
Λ
Σ
:=
inv
N
(
sts_inv
φ
)
.
Global
Instance
sts_inv_ne
n
:
Proper
(
pointwise_relation
_
(
dist
n
)
==>
dist
n
)
sts_inv
.
Proof
.
solve_proper
.
Qed
.
Global
Instance
sts_inv_proper
:
Proper
(
pointwise_relation
_
(
≡
)
==>
(
≡
))
sts_inv
.
Proof
.
solve_proper
.
Qed
.
Global
Instance
sts_ownS_proper
:
Proper
((
≡
)
==>
(
≡
)
==>
(
≡
))
sts_ownS
.
Proof
.
solve_proper
.
Qed
.
Global
Instance
sts_own_proper
s
:
Proper
((
≡
)
==>
(
≡
))
(
sts_own
s
)
.
Proof
.
solve_proper
.
Qed
.
Global
Instance
sts_ctx_ne
n
N
:
Proper
(
pointwise_relation
_
(
dist
n
)
==>
dist
n
)
(
sts_ctx
N
)
.
Proof
.
solve_proper
.
Qed
.
Global
Instance
sts_ctx_proper
N
:
Proper
(
pointwise_relation
_
(
≡
)
==>
(
≡
))
(
sts_ctx
N
)
.
Proof
.
solve_proper
.
Qed
.
Global
Instance
sts_ctx_always_stable
N
φ
:
AlwaysStable
(
sts_ctx
N
φ
)
.
Proof
.
apply
_
.
Qed
.
End
definitions
.
Typeclasses
Opaque
sts_own
sts_ownS
sts_ctx
.
Instance
:
Params
(
@
sts_inv
)
5
.
Instance
:
Params
(
@
sts_ownS
)
5
.
Instance
:
Params
(
@
sts_own
)
6
.
...
...
@@ -42,22 +58,6 @@ Section sts.
Implicit
Types
T
:
sts
.
tokens
sts
.
(** Setoids *)
Global
Instance
sts_inv_ne
n
γ
:
Proper
(
pointwise_relation
_
(
dist
n
)
==>
dist
n
)
(
sts_inv
γ
)
.
Proof
.
solve_proper
.
Qed
.
Global
Instance
sts_inv_proper
γ
:
Proper
(
pointwise_relation
_
(
≡
)
==>
(
≡
))
(
sts_inv
γ
)
.
Proof
.
solve_proper
.
Qed
.
Global
Instance
sts_ownS_proper
γ
:
Proper
((
≡
)
==>
(
≡
)
==>
(
≡
))
(
sts_ownS
γ
)
.
Proof
.
solve_proper
.
Qed
.
Global
Instance
sts_own_proper
γ
s
:
Proper
((
≡
)
==>
(
≡
))
(
sts_own
γ
s
)
.
Proof
.
solve_proper
.
Qed
.
Global
Instance
sts_ctx_ne
n
γ
N
:
Proper
(
pointwise_relation
_
(
dist
n
)
==>
dist
n
)
(
sts_ctx
γ
N
)
.
Proof
.
solve_proper
.
Qed
.
Global
Instance
sts_ctx_proper
γ
N
:
Proper
(
pointwise_relation
_
(
≡
)
==>
(
≡
))
(
sts_ctx
γ
N
)
.
Proof
.
solve_proper
.
Qed
.
(* The same rule as implication does *not* hold, as could be shown using
sts_frag_included. *)
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment