@@ -84,12 +84,12 @@ Furthermore, we assume that instances named $\gname_{\textmon{State}}$, $\gname_
\paragraph{World Satisfaction.}
We can now define the assertion $W$ (\emph{world satisfaction}) which ensures that the enabled invariants are actually maintained:
\begin{align*}
W \eqdef{}&\Exists I : \mathbb N \fpfn\Prop. \ownGhost{\gname_{\textmon{Inv}}}{\authfull\aginj(\latertinj(\wIso(I)))} * \Sep_{\iname\in\dom(I)}\left( \later I(\iname) * \ownGhost{\gname_{\textmon{Dis}}}{\set{\iname}}\lor\ownGhost{\gname_{\textmon{En}}}{\set{\iname}}\right)
W \eqdef{}&\Exists I : \mathbb N \fpfn\Prop. \ownGhost{\gname_{\textmon{Inv}}}{\setComp{\iname\mapsto\authfull\aginj(\latertinj(\wIso(I(\iname))))}{\iname\in\dom(I)}} * \Sep_{\iname\in\dom(I)}\left( \later I(\iname) * \ownGhost{\gname_{\textmon{Dis}}}{\set{\iname}}\lor\ownGhost{\gname_{\textmon{En}}}{\set{\iname}}\right)
\end{align*}
\paragraph{Invariants.}
The following assertion states that an invariant with name $\iname$ exists and maintains assertion $\prop$:
Next, we define \emph{view updates}, which are essentially the same as the resource updates of the base logic ($\Sref{sec:base-logic}$), except that they also have access to world satisfaction and can enable and disable invariants: