Forked from
Iris / Iris
6560 commits behind the upstream repository.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
be the same as
. This is a fairly intrusive change, but at least makes notations more consistent, and often shorter because fewer parentheses are needed. Note that viewshifts already had the same precedence as →.Robbert Krebbers authoredbe the same as
. This is a fairly intrusive change, but at least makes notations more consistent, and often shorter because fewer parentheses are needed. Note that viewshifts already had the same precedence as →.
ectx_lifting.v 2.52 KiB
(** Some derived lemmas for ectx-based languages *)
From iris.program_logic Require Export ectx_language weakestpre lifting.
From iris.program_logic Require Import ownership.
Section wp.
Context {expr val ectx state} {Λ : EctxLanguage expr val ectx state}.
Context {Σ : iFunctor}.
Implicit Types P : iProp (ectx_lang expr) Σ.
Implicit Types Φ : val → iProp (ectx_lang expr) Σ.
Implicit Types v : val.
Implicit Types e : expr.
Hint Resolve head_prim_reducible head_reducible_prim_step.
Notation wp_fork ef := (default True ef (flip (wp ⊤) (λ _, True)))%I.
Lemma wp_ectx_bind {E e} K Φ :
WP e @ E {{ v, WP fill K (of_val v) @ E {{ Φ }} }} ⊢ WP fill K e @ E {{ Φ }}.
Proof. apply: weakestpre.wp_bind. Qed.
Lemma wp_lift_head_step E1 E2
(φ : expr → state → option expr → Prop) Φ e1 σ1 :
E2 ⊆ E1 → to_val e1 = None →
head_reducible e1 σ1 →
(∀ e2 σ2 ef, head_step e1 σ1 e2 σ2 ef → φ e2 σ2 ef) →
(|={E1,E2}=> ▷ ownP σ1 ★ ▷ ∀ e2 σ2 ef,
(■ φ e2 σ2 ef ∧ ownP σ2) -★ |={E2,E1}=> WP e2 @ E1 {{ Φ }} ★ wp_fork ef)
⊢ WP e1 @ E1 {{ Φ }}.
Proof. eauto using wp_lift_step. Qed.
Lemma wp_lift_pure_head_step E (φ : expr → option expr → Prop) Φ e1 :
to_val e1 = None →
(∀ σ1, head_reducible e1 σ1) →
(∀ σ1 e2 σ2 ef, head_step e1 σ1 e2 σ2 ef → σ1 = σ2 ∧ φ e2 ef) →
(▷ ∀ e2 ef, ■ φ e2 ef → WP e2 @ E {{ Φ }} ★ wp_fork ef) ⊢ WP e1 @ E {{ Φ }}.
Proof. eauto using wp_lift_pure_step. Qed.
Lemma wp_lift_atomic_head_step {E Φ} e1
(φ : expr → state → option expr → Prop) σ1 :
atomic e1 →
head_reducible e1 σ1 →
(∀ e2 σ2 ef, head_step e1 σ1 e2 σ2 ef → φ e2 σ2 ef) →
▷ ownP σ1 ★ ▷ (∀ v2 σ2 ef, ■ φ (of_val v2) σ2 ef ∧ ownP σ2 -★ Φ v2 ★ wp_fork ef)
⊢ WP e1 @ E {{ Φ }}.
Proof. eauto using wp_lift_atomic_step. Qed.
Lemma wp_lift_atomic_det_head_step {E Φ e1} σ1 v2 σ2 ef :
atomic e1 →
head_reducible e1 σ1 →
(∀ e2' σ2' ef', head_step e1 σ1 e2' σ2' ef' →
σ2 = σ2' ∧ to_val e2' = Some v2 ∧ ef = ef') →
▷ ownP σ1 ★ ▷ (ownP σ2 -★ Φ v2 ★ wp_fork ef) ⊢ WP e1 @ E {{ Φ }}.
Proof. eauto using wp_lift_atomic_det_step. Qed.
Lemma wp_lift_pure_det_head_step {E Φ} e1 e2 ef :
to_val e1 = None →
(∀ σ1, head_reducible e1 σ1) →
(∀ σ1 e2' σ2 ef', head_step e1 σ1 e2' σ2 ef' → σ1 = σ2 ∧ e2 = e2' ∧ ef = ef')→
▷ (WP e2 @ E {{ Φ }} ★ wp_fork ef) ⊢ WP e1 @ E {{ Φ }}.
Proof. eauto using wp_lift_pure_det_step. Qed.
End wp.