Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. Jan 04, 2017
  2. Jan 03, 2017
  3. Dec 09, 2016
  4. Nov 29, 2016
  5. Nov 23, 2016
  6. Nov 21, 2016
  7. Nov 20, 2016
  8. Oct 03, 2016
  9. Sep 20, 2016
  10. Aug 08, 2016
    • Ralf Jung's avatar
      Better Coq 8.6 compatibility · ae135201
      Ralf Jung authored
      With Coq 8.6, you can no longer have intro patterns that give more names than
      the constructor has.  Also, patterns with too few names are now interpreted as
      filling up with "?", rather than putting the unnamed parts into the goal again.
      
      Furthermore, it seems the behavior of "simplify_eq/=" changed, I guess
      hypotheses are considered in different order now.  I managed to work around
      this, but it all seem kind of fragile.
      
      The next compilation failure is an "Anyomaly: ... Please report", so that's what I will do.
      ae135201
  11. Aug 02, 2016
  12. Jul 27, 2016
  13. Jul 22, 2016
  14. Jul 12, 2016
  15. Jul 11, 2016
  16. Jul 05, 2016
  17. May 31, 2016
  18. Mar 23, 2016
  19. Mar 10, 2016
  20. Mar 05, 2016
  21. Mar 04, 2016
  22. Mar 03, 2016
  23. Feb 24, 2016
  24. Feb 22, 2016
    • Robbert Krebbers's avatar
      Let set_solver not use eauto by default. · 9aff6bb6
      Robbert Krebbers authored
      In most cases there is a lot of duplicate proof search performed by
      both naive_solver and eauto. Especially since naive_solver calls its
      tactic (in the case of set_solver this used to be eauto) quite eagerly
      this made it very slow.
      
      Note that set_solver is this too slow and should be improved.
      9aff6bb6
    • Robbert Krebbers's avatar
      Let set_solver not use eauto by default. · de5f0f84
      Robbert Krebbers authored
      In most cases there is a lot of duplicate proof search performed by
      both naive_solver and eauto. Especially since naive_solver calls its
      tactic (in the case of set_solver this used to be eauto) quite eagerly
      this made it very slow.
      
      Note that set_solver is this too slow and should be improved.
      de5f0f84
  25. Feb 17, 2016
  26. Feb 16, 2016
  27. Feb 15, 2016
Loading