- Oct 25, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
And also rename the corresponding proof mode tactics.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Oct 18, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Oct 16, 2016
-
-
Jacques-Henri Jourdan authored
This fact is deduced from reducibility. Unfortunately, this sometimes depends on the type of states being inhabited, so that this additional hypothesis sometimes appear.
-
- Oct 13, 2016
- Oct 12, 2016
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
rename program_logic.{ownership -> wsat}. It really is about world satisfaction and invariants more than about ownership.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- Oct 10, 2016
- Oct 07, 2016
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- Oct 06, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Oct 05, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Sep 28, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This allows us to factor out properties about connectives that commute with the big operators.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Sep 27, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Used in iRevert, iClear, iFrame, and for generalizing the IH in iInduction and iLöb.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
As proposed by JH Jourdan in issue 34.
-
- Sep 20, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Sep 09, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Before this commit, given "HP" : P and "H" : P -★ Q with Q persistent, one could write: iSpecialize ("H" with "#HP") to eliminate the wand in "H" while keeping the resource "HP". The lemma: own_valid : own γ x ⊢ ✓ x was the prototypical example where this pattern (using the #) was used. However, the pattern was too limited. For example, given "H" : P₁ -★ P₂ -★ Q", one could not write iSpecialize ("H" with "#HP₁") because P₂ -★ Q is not persistent, even when Q is. So, instead, this commit introduces the following tactic: iSpecialize pm_trm as # which allows one to eliminate implications and wands while being able to use all hypotheses to prove the premises, as well as being able to use all hypotheses to prove the resulting goal. In the case of iDestruct, we now check whether all branches of the introduction pattern start with an `#` (moving the hypothesis to the persistent context) or `%` (moving the hypothesis to the pure Coq context). If this is the case, we allow one to use all hypotheses for proving the premises, as well as for proving the resulting goal.
-
Jacques-Henri Jourdan authored
-
- Sep 07, 2016
-
-
Jacques-Henri Jourdan authored
Define disjointness of namespaces in terms of masks.\n\nThe proofs are made simpler and some lemmas get more general.
-
Jacques-Henri Jourdan authored
-
- Sep 06, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
I had to perform some renaming to avoid name clashes.
-
- Sep 05, 2016
-
-
Jacques-Henri Jourdan authored
-
- Sep 04, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Aug 29, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This way we ensure that Coq gives an error message when one accidentially writes "N ⊆ E" instead of "nclose N ⊆ E". Before, it used the ⊆ instance of lists.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This avoids Coq distinguishing iProp and uPred (iResUR _) when it should not.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
(which are useful in Amin's logical relations development).
-
- Aug 28, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This also removes the double use of the name 'wp_fork' in both program_logic/weakestpre and heap_lang/lifting.
-