Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
I
iris
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Monitor
Incidents
Service Desk
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Terms and privacy
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Tej Chajed
iris
Commits
2fa22353
Commit
2fa22353
authored
1 year ago
by
Ralf Jung
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
explain why gmap_view_both_dfrac_valid_discrete_total is unidirectional
parent
e2e7baaa
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
iris/algebra/lib/gmap_view.v
+5
-0
5 additions, 0 deletions
iris/algebra/lib/gmap_view.v
with
5 additions
and
0 deletions
iris/algebra/lib/gmap_view.v
+
5
−
0
View file @
2fa22353
...
...
@@ -307,6 +307,11 @@ Section lemmas.
split
;
first
by
apply
cmra_valid_validN
.
by
apply
:
cmra_included_includedN
.
Qed
.
(** The backwards direction here does not hold: if [dq = DfracOwn 1] but
[v ≠ v'], we have to find a suitable erased fraction [dq'] to satisfy the view
relation, but there is no way to satisfy [Some (DfracOwn 1, v) ≼ Some (dq', v')]
for any [dq']. The "if and only if" version of this lemma would have to
involve some extra condition like [dq = DfracOwn 1 → v = v']. *)
Lemma
gmap_view_both_dfrac_valid_discrete_total
`{
!
CmraDiscrete
V
,
!
CmraTotal
V
}
dp
m
k
dq
v
:
✓
(
gmap_view_auth
dp
m
⋅
gmap_view_frag
k
dq
v
)
→
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment