Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit b990ffb7 authored by Ralf Jung's avatar Ralf Jung
Browse files

add missing changelog

parent 5e58df61
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ lemma.
that works for all `n` : `x ≡{n}≡ y → x ≡ y`.
* Enable `f_equiv` and `solve_proper` to exploit the fact that `≡{n}≡` is a
subrelation of `≡` and `=`.
* Rename `iso_cmra_mixin_restrict` to `iso_cmra_mixin_restrict_validity`, and
simplify its statement and that of `iso_cmra_mixin` by removing the `g_equiv`
assumption that follows from the other assumptions.
* Add `inj_cmra_mixin_restrict_validity` as a more general version of
`iso_cmra_mixin_restrict_validity`.
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment