Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 260e0593 authored by Ralf Jung's avatar Ralf Jung
Browse files

extend proof_mode.md

parent 6be1cdd2
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -328,6 +328,9 @@ _introduction patterns_:
+ Either the proposition `P` or `Q` should be persistent.
+ Either `ipat1` or `ipat2` should be `_`, which results in one of the
conjuncts to be thrown away.
- `[% ipat]` : existential elimination. Falls back to (separating) conjunction
elimination in case the hypothesis is not an existential, so this pattern also
works for (separating) conjunctions with a pure left-hand side.
- `(pat1 & pat2 & ... & patn)` : syntactic sugar for `[pat1 [pat2 .. patn ..]]`
to destruct nested (separating) conjunctions.
- `[ipat1|ipat2]` : disjunction elimination.
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment