Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
Iris
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package registry
Model registry
Operate
Terraform modules
Monitor
Service Desk
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Terms and privacy
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
William Mansky
Iris
Commits
b544d65d
Commit
b544d65d
authored
5 years ago
by
Ralf Jung
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
merge proof_guide and style_guide
parent
1706200d
No related branches found
Branches containing commit
No related tags found
Tags containing commit
No related merge requests found
Changes
3
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
3 changed files
README.md
+2
-2
2 additions, 2 deletions
README.md
docs/proof_guide.md
+133
-4
133 additions, 4 deletions
docs/proof_guide.md
docs/style_guide.md
+0
-136
0 additions, 136 deletions
docs/style_guide.md
with
135 additions
and
142 deletions
README.md
+
2
−
2
View file @
b544d65d
...
...
@@ -114,8 +114,8 @@ that should be compatible with this version:
Getting along with Iris in Coq:
*
Iris proof patterns are documented in the
[
proof guide
](
docs/proof_guide.md
)
.
*
Syntactic conventions are described in the
[
style
guide
](
docs/
style
_guide.md
)
.
*
Iris proof patterns
and conventions
are documented in the
[
proof
guide
](
docs/
proof
_guide.md
)
.
*
The Iris tactics are described in the
[
the Iris Proof Mode (IPM) / MoSeL documentation
](
docs/proof_mode.md
)
as well as the
[
HeapLang documentation
](
docs/heap_lang.md
)
.
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
docs/proof_guide.md
+
133
−
4
View file @
b544d65d
# Iris Proof Guide
This work-in-progress document serves to explain how Iris proofs are typically
carried out in Coq: what are the common patterns, what are the common pitfalls.
This complements the tactic documentation for the
[
proof mode
](
./proof_mode.md
)
and
[
HeapLang
](
./heap_lang.md
)
as well as the documentation of syntactic conventions in
the
[
style guide
](
./style_guide.md
)
.
carried out in Coq: what are the common patterns and conventions, what are the
common pitfalls. This complements the tactic documentation for the
[
proof mode
](
./proof_mode.md
)
and
[
HeapLang
](
./heap_lang.md
)
.
## Order of `Requires`
...
...
@@ -260,3 +259,133 @@ this still need to be written up properly, but here is some background material:
*
[
Type Classes for Mathematics in Type Theory
](
http://www.eelis.net/research/math-classes/mscs.pdf
)
*
[
Canonical Structures for the working Coq user
](
https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00816703v1/document
)
## Implicit generalization
We often use the implicit generalization feature of Coq, triggered by a backtic:
`` `{!term A B}``
means that an implicit argument of type
`term A B`
is added,
and if any of the identifiers that are used here is not yet bound, it gets added
as well. Usually,
`term`
will be some existing type class or similar, and we
use this syntax to also generalize over
`A`
and
`B`
; then the above is
equivalent to
`{A B} {Hterm: term A B}`
. The
`!`
in front of the term disables
an even stronger form of generalization, where if
`term`
is a type class then
all missing arguments get implicitly generalized as well. This is sometimes
useful, e.g. we can write
`` `{Countable C}``
instead of
`` `{!EqDecision C,
!Countable C}``
. However, generally it is more important to be aware of the
assumptions you are making, so implicit generalization without
`!`
should be
avoided.
## Type class resolution control
When you are writing a module that exports some Iris term for others to use
(e.g.,
`join_handle`
in the
[
spawn module
](
theories/heap_lang/lib/spawn.v
)
), be
sure to mark these terms as opaque for type class search at the
*end*
of your
module (and outside any section):
```
Typeclasses Opaque join_handle.
```
This makes sure that the proof mode does not "look into" your definition when it
is used by clients.
## Notations
Notations starting with
`(`
or
`{`
should be left at their default level (
`0`
),
and inner subexpressions that are bracketed by delimiters should be left at
their default level (
`200`
).
Moreover, correct parsing of notations sometimes relies on Coq's automatic
left-factoring, which can require coordinating levels of certain "conflicting"
notations and their subexpressions. For instance, to disambiguate
`(⊢@{ PROP })`
and
`(⊢@{ PROP } P)`
, Coq must factor out a nonterminal for
`⊢@{ PROP }`
, but it
can only do so if all occurrences of
`⊢@{ PROP }`
agree on the precedences for
all subexpressions.
For details, consult
[
the Coq manual
](
https://coq.inria.fr/refman/user-extensions/syntax-extensions.html#simple-factorization-rules
)
.
## Naming conventions for variables/arguments/hypotheses
### small letters
*
a : A = cmraT or ofeT
*
b : B = cmraT or ofeT
*
c
*
d
*
e : expr = expressions
*
f = some generic function
*
g = some generic function
*
h : heap
*
i
*
j
*
k
*
l
*
m : iGst = ghost state
*
m
*
= prefix for option
*
n
*
o
*
p
*
q
*
r : iRes = resources
*
s = state (STSs)
*
s = stuckness bits
*
t
*
u
*
v : val = values of language
*
w
*
x
*
y
*
z
### capital letters
*
A : Type, cmraT or ofeT
*
B : Type, cmraT or ofeT
*
C
*
D
*
E : coPset = Viewshift masks
*
F = a functor
*
G
*
H = hypotheses
*
I = indexing sets
*
J
*
K : ectx = evaluation contexts
*
K = keys of a map
*
L
*
M = maps / global CMRA
*
N : namespace
*
O
*
P : uPred, iProp or Prop
*
Q : uPred, iProp or Prop
*
R : uPred, iProp or Prop
*
S : set state = state sets in STSs
*
T : set token = token sets in STSs
*
U
*
V : abstraction of value type in frame shift assertions
*
W
*
X : sets
*
Y : sets
*
Z : sets
### small greek letters
*
γ : gname
*
σ : state = state of language
*
φ : interpretation of STS/Auth
### capital greek letters
*
Φ : general predicate (over uPred, iProp or Prop)
*
Ψ : general predicate (over uPred, iProp or Prop)
## Naming conventions for algebraic classes
### Suffixes
*
O: OFEs
*
R: cameras
*
UR: unital cameras or resources algebras
*
F: functors (can be combined with all of the above, e.g. OF is an OFE functor)
*
G: global camera functor management (typeclass; see
[
proof\_guide.md
](
./proof_guide.md
)
)
*
I: bunched implication logic (of type
`bi`
)
*
SI: step-indexed bunched implication logic (of type
`sbi`
)
*
T: canonical structures for algebraic classes (for example ofeT for OFEs, cmraT for cameras)
*
Σ: global camera functor management (
`gFunctors`
; see
[
proof\_guide.md
](
./proof_guide.md
)
)
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
docs/style_guide.md
deleted
100644 → 0
+
0
−
136
View file @
1706200d
# Iris Style Guide
This document lays down syntactic conventions about how we usually write our
Iris proofs in Coq. It is a work-in-progress. This complements the tactic
documentation for the
[
proof mode
](
./proof_mode.md
)
and
[
HeapLang
](
./heap_lang.md
)
as
well as the
[
proof guide
](
./proof_guide.md
)
.
## Implicit generalization
We often use the implicit generalization feature of Coq, triggered by a backtic:
`` `{!term A B}``
means that an implicit argument of type
`term A B`
is added,
and if any of the identifiers that are used here is not yet bound, it gets added
as well. Usually,
`term`
will be some existing type class or similar, and we
use this syntax to also generalize over
`A`
and
`B`
; then the above is
equivalent to
`{A B} {Hterm: term A B}`
. The
`!`
in front of the term disables
an even stronger form of generalization, where if
`term`
is a type class then
all missing arguments get implicitly generalized as well. This is sometimes
useful, e.g. we can write
`` `{Countable C}``
instead of
`` `{!EqDecision C,
!Countable C}``
. However, generally it is more important to be aware of the
assumptions you are making, so implicit generalization without
`!`
should be
avoided.
## Type class resolution control
When you are writing a module that exports some Iris term for others to use
(e.g.,
`join_handle`
in the
[
spawn module
](
theories/heap_lang/lib/spawn.v
)
), be
sure to mark these terms as opaque for type class search at the
*end*
of your
module (and outside any section):
```
Typeclasses Opaque join_handle.
```
This makes sure that the proof mode does not "look into" your definition when it
is used by clients.
## Notations
Notations starting with
`(`
or
`{`
should be left at their default level (
`0`
),
and inner subexpressions that are bracketed by delimiters should be left at
their default level (
`200`
).
Moreover, correct parsing of notations sometimes relies on Coq's automatic
left-factoring, which can require coordinating levels of certain "conflicting"
notations and their subexpressions. For instance, to disambiguate
`(⊢@{ PROP })`
and
`(⊢@{ PROP } P)`
, Coq must factor out a nonterminal for
`⊢@{ PROP }`
, but it
can only do so if all occurrences of
`⊢@{ PROP }`
agree on the precedences for
all subexpressions.
For details, consult
[
the Coq manual
](
https://coq.inria.fr/refman/user-extensions/syntax-extensions.html#simple-factorization-rules
)
.
## Naming conventions for variables/arguments/hypotheses
### small letters
*
a : A = cmraT or ofeT
*
b : B = cmraT or ofeT
*
c
*
d
*
e : expr = expressions
*
f = some generic function
*
g = some generic function
*
h : heap
*
i
*
j
*
k
*
l
*
m : iGst = ghost state
*
m
*
= prefix for option
*
n
*
o
*
p
*
q
*
r : iRes = resources
*
s = state (STSs)
*
s = stuckness bits
*
t
*
u
*
v : val = values of language
*
w
*
x
*
y
*
z
### capital letters
*
A : Type, cmraT or ofeT
*
B : Type, cmraT or ofeT
*
C
*
D
*
E : coPset = Viewshift masks
*
F = a functor
*
G
*
H = hypotheses
*
I = indexing sets
*
J
*
K : ectx = evaluation contexts
*
K = keys of a map
*
L
*
M = maps / global CMRA
*
N : namespace
*
O
*
P : uPred, iProp or Prop
*
Q : uPred, iProp or Prop
*
R : uPred, iProp or Prop
*
S : set state = state sets in STSs
*
T : set token = token sets in STSs
*
U
*
V : abstraction of value type in frame shift assertions
*
W
*
X : sets
*
Y : sets
*
Z : sets
### small greek letters
*
γ : gname
*
σ : state = state of language
*
φ : interpretation of STS/Auth
### capital greek letters
*
Φ : general predicate (over uPred, iProp or Prop)
*
Ψ : general predicate (over uPred, iProp or Prop)
## Naming conventions for algebraic classes
### Suffixes
*
O: OFEs
*
R: cameras
*
UR: unital cameras or resources algebras
*
F: functors (can be combined with all of the above, e.g. OF is an OFE functor)
*
G: global camera functor management (typeclass; see
[
proof\_guide.md
](
./proof_guide.md
)
)
*
I: bunched implication logic (of type
`bi`
)
*
SI: step-indexed bunched implication logic (of type
`sbi`
)
*
T: canonical structures for algebraic classes (for example ofeT for OFEs, cmraT for cameras)
*
Σ: global camera functor management (
`gFunctors`
; see
[
proof\_guide.md
](
./proof_guide.md
)
)
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment