Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
Iris
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package registry
Model registry
Operate
Terraform modules
Monitor
Service Desk
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Terms and privacy
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
William Mansky
Iris
Commits
e695dfde
Commit
e695dfde
authored
5 years ago
by
Ralf Jung
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
apply review feedback
parent
01fc1771
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
theories/base_logic/lib/gc.v
+25
-35
25 additions, 35 deletions
theories/base_logic/lib/gc.v
with
25 additions
and
35 deletions
theories/base_logic/lib/gc.v
+
25
−
35
View file @
e695dfde
...
...
@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ From iris.algebra Require Import auth excl gmap.
From
iris
.
base_logic
.
lib
Require
Import
own
invariants
gen_heap
.
From
iris
.
proofmode
Require
Import
tactics
.
Set
Default
Proof
Using
"Type"
.
Import
uPred
.
(** A "GC" location is a location that can never be deallocated explicitly by
the program. It provides a persistent witness that will always allow reading
...
...
@@ -29,7 +28,7 @@ Definition gc_mapUR (L V : Type) `{Countable L} : ucmraT := gmapUR L $ prodR
(
agreeR
$
leibnizO
(
V
→
Prop
))
.
Definition
to_gc_map
{
L
V
:
Type
}
`{
Countable
L
}
(
gcm
:
gmap
L
(
V
*
(
V
→
Prop
)))
:
gc_mapUR
L
V
:=
(
λ
p
:
V
*
(
V
→
Prop
),
(
Excl'
p
.
1
,
to_agree
p
.
2
))
<$>
gcm
.
prod_map
(
λ
x
,
Excl'
x
)
to_agree
<$>
gcm
.
Class
gcG
(
L
V
:
Type
)
(
Σ
:
gFunctors
)
`{
Countable
L
}
:=
GcG
{
gc_inG
:>
inG
Σ
(
authR
(
gc_mapUR
L
V
));
...
...
@@ -52,18 +51,17 @@ Proof. solve_inG. Qed.
Section
defs
.
Context
{
L
V
:
Type
}
`{
Countable
L
}
.
Context
`{
!
invG
Σ
,
!
gen_heapG
L
V
Σ
,
gG
:
!
gcG
L
V
Σ
}
.
Implicit
Types
(
gcm
:
gmap
L
(
V
*
(
V
→
Prop
)))
(
l
:
L
)
(
v
:
V
)
(
I
:
V
→
Prop
)
.
Definition
gc_inv_P
:
iProp
Σ
:=
(
∃
gcm
,
own
(
gc_name
gG
)
(
●
to_gc_map
gcm
)
∗
(
[
∗
map
]
l
↦
p
∈
gcm
,
⌜
p
.
2
p
.
1
⌝
∗
(
l
↦
p
.
1
)
)
)
%
I
.
(
∃
gcm
:
gmap
L
(
V
*
(
V
→
Prop
))
,
own
(
gc_name
gG
)
(
●
to_gc_map
gcm
)
∗
[
∗
map
]
l
↦
p
∈
gcm
,
⌜
p
.
2
p
.
1
⌝
∗
l
↦
p
.
1
)
%
I
.
Definition
gc_inv
:
iProp
Σ
:=
inv
gcN
gc_inv_P
.
Definition
gc_mapsto
l
v
I
:
iProp
Σ
:=
Definition
gc_mapsto
(
l
:
L
)
(
v
:
V
)
(
I
:
V
→
Prop
)
:
iProp
Σ
:=
own
(
gc_name
gG
)
(
◯
{[
l
:=
(
Excl'
v
,
to_agree
I
)]})
.
Definition
is_gc_loc
l
I
:
iProp
Σ
:=
Definition
is_gc_loc
(
l
:
L
)
(
I
:
V
→
Prop
)
:
iProp
Σ
:=
own
(
gc_name
gG
)
(
◯
{[
l
:=
(
None
,
to_agree
I
)]})
.
End
defs
.
...
...
@@ -96,9 +94,10 @@ Section to_gc_map.
Proof
.
by
rewrite
/
to_gc_map
lookup_fmap
=>
->
.
Qed
.
Lemma
lookup_to_gc_map_Some_2
gcm
l
v'
I'
:
to_gc_map
gcm
!!
l
≡
Some
(
v'
,
I'
)
→
∃
v
I
,
v'
≡
Excl'
v
∧
I'
≡
to_agree
I
/\
gcm
!!
l
=
Some
(
v
,
I
)
.
to_gc_map
gcm
!!
l
≡
Some
(
v'
,
I'
)
→
∃
v
I
,
v'
≡
Excl'
v
∧
I'
≡
to_agree
I
∧
gcm
!!
l
=
Some
(
v
,
I
)
.
Proof
.
rewrite
/
to_gc_map
lookup_fmap
.
rewrite
fmap_Some_equiv
.
rewrite
/
to_gc_map
/
prod_map
lookup_fmap
.
rewrite
fmap_Some_equiv
.
intros
([]
&
Hsome
&
[
Heqv
HeqI
])
.
eauto
.
Qed
.
End
to_gc_map
.
...
...
@@ -111,12 +110,8 @@ Proof.
iModIntro
.
iExists
(
GcG
L
V
γ
)
.
iAssert
(
gc_inv_P
(
gG
:=
GcG
L
V
γ
))
with
"[H●]"
as
"P"
.
{
iExists
_
.
iFrame
.
by
iApply
big_sepM_empty
.
}
iMod
((
inv_alloc
gcN
E
gc_inv_P
)
with
"P"
)
as
"#InvGC"
.
iModIntro
.
iFrame
"#"
.
{
iExists
_
.
iFrame
.
done
.
}
iApply
(
inv_alloc
gcN
E
gc_inv_P
with
"P"
)
.
Qed
.
Section
gc
.
...
...
@@ -139,20 +134,18 @@ Section gc.
gc_inv
L
V
-∗
l
↦
v
=
{
E
}
=∗
gc_mapsto
l
v
I
.
Proof
.
iIntros
(
HN
HI
)
"#Hinv Hl"
.
iMod
(
inv_acc_timeless
_
gcN
_
with
"Hinv"
)
as
"[P Hclose]"
=>
//.
iDestruct
"P"
as
(
gcm
)
"[H● HsepM]"
.
iMod
(
inv_acc_timeless
_
gcN
with
"Hinv"
)
as
"[
H
P Hclose]"
=>
//.
iDestruct
"
H
P"
as
(
gcm
)
"[H● HsepM]"
.
destruct
(
gcm
!!
l
)
as
[
v'
|
]
eqn
:
Hlookup
.
-
(* auth map contains l --> contradiction *)
iDestruct
(
big_sepM_lookup
with
"HsepM"
)
as
"[_ Hl']"
=>
//.
by
iDestruct
(
mapsto_valid_2
with
"Hl Hl'"
)
as
%
?
.
-
iMod
(
own_update
with
"H●"
)
as
"[H● H◯]"
.
{
apply
lookup_to_gc_map_None
in
Hlookup
.
{
apply
lookup_to_gc_map_None
in
Hlookup
.
apply
(
auth_update_alloc
_
(
to_gc_map
(
<
[
l
:=
(
v
,
I
)]
>
gcm
))
(
to_gc_map
({[
l
:=
(
v
,
I
)]})))
.
rewrite
to_gc_map_insert
to_gc_map_singleton
.
pose
proof
(
to_gc_map_valid
gcm
)
.
setoid_rewrite
alloc_singleton_local_update
=>
//.
}
setoid_rewrite
alloc_singleton_local_update
=>
//.
}
iMod
(
"Hclose"
with
"[H● HsepM Hl]"
)
.
+
iExists
_
.
iDestruct
(
big_sepM_insert
with
"[HsepM Hl]"
)
as
"HsepM"
=>
//
;
iFrame
.
...
...
@@ -218,24 +211,22 @@ Section gc.
(
⌜
I
v
⌝
∗
l
↦
v
∗
(
∀
w
,
⌜
I
w
⌝
-∗
l
↦
w
==∗
gc_mapsto
l
w
I
∗
|
=
{
E
∖
↑
gcN
,
E
}=>
True
))
.
Proof
.
iIntros
(
HN
)
"#Hinv"
.
iMod
(
inv_acc_timeless
_
gcN
_
with
"Hinv"
)
as
"[P Hclose]"
=>
//.
iMod
(
inv_acc_timeless
_
gcN
_
with
"Hinv"
)
as
"[
H
P Hclose]"
=>
//.
iIntros
"!>"
(
l
v
I
)
"Hgc_l"
.
iDestruct
"P"
as
(
gcm
)
"[H● HsepM]"
.
iDestruct
"
H
P"
as
(
gcm
)
"[H● HsepM]"
.
iDestruct
(
gc_mapsto_lookup_Some
with
"Hgc_l H●"
)
as
%
Hsome
.
iDestruct
(
big_sepM_delete
with
"HsepM"
)
as
"[[HI Hl] HsepM]"
=>
//=.
iFrame
.
iIntros
(
w
)
"% Hl"
.
iMod
(
own_update_2
with
"H● Hgc_l"
)
as
"[H● H◯]"
.
{
apply
(
auth_update
_
_
(
<
[
l
:=
(
Excl'
w
,
to_agree
I
)]
>
(
to_gc_map
gcm
))
{[
l
:=
(
Excl'
w
,
to_agree
I
)]})
.
{
apply
(
auth_update
_
_
(
<
[
l
:=
(
Excl'
w
,
to_agree
I
)]
>
(
to_gc_map
gcm
))
{[
l
:=
(
Excl'
w
,
to_agree
I
)]})
.
apply
:
singleton_local_update
.
{
by
apply
lookup_to_gc_map_Some
in
Hsome
.
}
apply
prod_local_update
;
simpl
.
-
apply
:
option_local_update
.
apply
:
exclusive_local_update
.
done
.
-
done
.
}
apply
:
prod_local_update_1
.
apply
:
option_local_update
.
apply
:
exclusive_local_update
.
done
.
}
iDestruct
(
big_sepM_insert
_
_
_
(
w
,
I
)
with
"[Hl HsepM]"
)
as
"HsepM"
;
[
|
by
iFrame
|
]
.
{
apply
lookup_delete
.
}
rewrite
insert_delete
.
rewrite
<-
to_gc_map_insert
.
iModIntro
.
iFrame
.
rewrite
insert_delete
-
to_gc_map_insert
.
iModIntro
.
iFrame
.
iMod
(
"Hclose"
with
"[H● HsepM]"
);
[
iExists
_;
by
iFrame
|
by
iModIntro
]
.
Qed
.
...
...
@@ -245,17 +236,16 @@ Section gc.
∃
v
,
⌜
I
v
⌝
∗
l
↦
v
∗
(
l
↦
v
=
{
E
∖
↑
gcN
,
E
}
=∗
⌜
True
⌝
)
.
Proof
.
iIntros
(
HN
)
"#Hinv Hgc_l"
.
iMod
(
inv_acc_timeless
_
gcN
_
with
"Hinv"
)
as
"[P Hclose]"
=>
//.
iMod
(
inv_acc_timeless
_
gcN
_
with
"Hinv"
)
as
"[
H
P Hclose]"
=>
//.
iModIntro
.
iDestruct
"P"
as
(
gcm
)
"[H● HsepM]"
.
iDestruct
(
is_gc_lookup_Some
with
"Hgc_l H●"
)
as
%
Hsome
.
destruct
Hsome
as
[
v
Hsome
]
.
iDestruct
"HP"
as
(
gcm
)
"[H● HsepM]"
.
iDestruct
(
is_gc_lookup_Some
with
"Hgc_l H●"
)
as
%
[
v
Hsome
]
.
iDestruct
(
big_sepM_lookup_acc
with
"HsepM"
)
as
"[[#HI Hl] HsepM]"
=>
//.
iExists
_
.
iFrame
"∗#"
.
iIntros
"Hl"
.
iMod
(
"Hclose"
with
"[H● HsepM Hl]"
);
last
done
.
iExists
_
.
iFrame
.
iApply
(
"HsepM"
with
"[Hl]"
)
.
by
iFrame
.
iApply
(
"HsepM"
with
"[
$
Hl
//
]"
)
.
Qed
.
End
gc
.
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment