Use `_inv` for the reverse direction.

Also refactor the proofs to make better reuse of existing lemmas.

Used the following script:

sed '
s/\bCofeMor/OfeMor/g;
s/\-c>/\-d>/g;
s/\bcFunctor/oFunctor/g;
s/\bCFunctor/OFunctor/g;
s/\b\%CF/\%OF/g;
s/\bconstCF/constOF/g;
s/\bidCF/idOF/g
s/\bdiscreteC/discreteO/g;
s/\bleibnizC/leibnizO/g;
s/\bunitC/unitO/g;
s/\bprodC/prodO/g;
s/\bsumC/sumO/g;
s/\bboolC/boolO/g;
s/\bnatC/natO/g;
s/\bpositiveC/positiveO/g;
s/\bNC/NO/g;
s/\bZC/ZO/g;
s/\boptionC/optionO/g;
s/\blaterC/laterO/g;
s/\bofe\_fun/discrete\_fun/g;
s/\bdiscrete\_funC/discrete\_funO/g;
s/\bofe\_morC/ofe\_morO/g;
s/\bsigC/sigO/g;
s/\buPredC/uPredO/g;
s/\bcsumC/csumO/g;
s/\bagreeC/agreeO/g;
s/\bauthC/authO/g;
s/\bnamespace_mapC/namespace\_mapO/g;
s/\bcmra\_ofeC/cmra\_ofeO/g;
s/\bucmra\_ofeC/ucmra\_ofeO/g;
s/\bexclC/exclO/g;
s/\bgmapC/gmapO/g;
s/\blistC/listO/g;
s/\bvecC/vecO/g;
s/\bgsetC/gsetO/g;
s/\bgset\_disjC/gset\_disjO/g;
s/\bcoPsetC/coPsetO/g;
s/\bgmultisetC/gmultisetO/g;
s/\bufracC/ufracO/g
s/\bfracC/fracO/g;
s/\bvalidityC/validityO/g;
s/\bbi\_ofeC/bi\_ofeO/g;
s/\bsbi\_ofeC/sbi\_ofeO/g;
s/\bmonPredC/monPredO/g;
s/\bstateC/stateO/g;
s/\bvalC/valO/g;
s/\bexprC/exprO/g;
s/\blocC/locO/g;
' -i $(find theories -name "*.v")

Adding a hint without a database now triggers a deprecation warning in
Coq master (https://github.com/coq/coq/pull/8987).

Marianna Rapoport authored 6 years ago and Ralf Jung committed 6 years ago

- Removing head of list of observations after each reduction step in definition of wp
- Adding support for observations to state_interp and world
- Applying Ralf's suggestions to previous commit (e.g. replacing /\ and -> with unicode characters)

It can be infered now.

This reverts commit 913059d2.

This reverts commit 849abb8d, reversing changes
made to 8de0b894.  The merge was done
accidentally, before review happened.

This is derived from `wp_forget_not_stuck` and a trivial preorder on
stuckness bits. (The two lemmas are redundant, but I have examples
where each seems more natural than the other.)

I did *not* bake `wp_stuckness_mono` into `strong_mono` for two
reasons. Mainly, I didn't see a nice way to combine the two proofs
(beyond `cut`). Less important, changing the type of `wp_strong_mono`
will break code.

I saw no need for `stuckness_flip`: strong atomicity always works,
while weak atomicity works only for expressions that are not stuck.
Since this seemed unclear, I split lemma `wp_atomic'` up into
`wp_strong_atomic` (parametric in the WP's `s`) and `wp_weak_atomic`
(not). The proof mode instance is stated in terms of the derived rule
`wp_atomic` (parametric in `s`).