Since Coq 8.4 did not backtrack on eauto premises, we used to ensure
that hints like

  Hint Extern 0 (?x ≡{_}≡ ?y) => reflexivity.

were not used for goals involving evars by writing ?x ≡{_}≡ ?y instead
of _ ≡{_}≡ _.

This seems to be a legacy issue that no longer applies to Coq 8.5, so
I have removed these restrictions making these hints thus more powerful.

change statement of inv-open lemmas such that they do not force the invariant, and the 'inner step', to appear right next to each other

The rationale is that, just like the always lemmas about uPred and the frame-preserving updates for maps and iprdos, the versions with the ' are the "more specific" versions, hard-coding more assumptions in the shape of their conclusion.

thanks to Christian Doczkal <doczkal@ps.uni-saarland.de> for the Makefile snippet!

Also do some minor clean up.

tests.v is temporarily broken

Before they were not, for example:

  Check ('10 + '10 )%L.           (* prints ('10 + '10)%L *)
  Eval simpl in ('10 + '10 )%L.   (* prints (Lit 10 + Lit 10)%L *)

The notation added by this comment is ambigious, for example the
notation '10 + '10 is used for both:

  BinOp PlusOp (Lit (LitNat 10)) (Lit (LitNat 10))
  BinOp PlusOp (of_val (LitV (LitNat 10))) (of_val (LitV (LitNat 10)))

But fortunatelly, these terms are convertible.

Note that literals 'x are now parsed as values (as a LitV), but still
pretty printed when they appear as expressions (as a Lit).

globalC -> globalF
New notation: iPropG, iFunctorG