- Feb 20, 2019
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Get rid of using `Collection` and favor `set` everywhere. Also, prefer conversion functions that are called `X_to_Y`. The following sed script performs most of the renaming, with the exception of: - `set`, which has been renamed into `propset`. I couldn't do this rename using `sed` since it's too context sensitive. - There was a spurious rename of `Vec.of_list`, which I correctly manually. - Updating some section names and comments. ``` sed ' s/SimpleCollection/SemiSet/g; s/FinCollection/FinSet/g; s/CollectionMonad/MonadSet/g; s/Collection/Set\_/g; s/collection\_simple/set\_semi\_set/g; s/fin\_collection/fin\_set/g; s/collection\_monad\_simple/monad\_set\_semi\_set/g; s/collection\_equiv/set\_equiv/g; s/\bbset/boolset/g; s/mkBSet/BoolSet/g; s/mkSet/PropSet/g; s/set\_equivalence/set\_equiv\_equivalence/g; s/collection\_subseteq/set\_subseteq/g; s/collection\_disjoint/set\_disjoint/g; s/collection\_fold/set\_fold/g; s/collection\_map/set\_map/g; s/collection\_size/set\_size/g; s/collection\_filter/set\_filter/g; s/collection\_guard/set\_guard/g; s/collection\_choose/set\_choose/g; s/collection\_ind/set\_ind/g; s/collection\_wf/set\_wf/g; s/map\_to\_collection/map\_to\_set/g; s/map\_of\_collection/set\_to\_map/g; s/map\_of\_list/list\_to\_map/g; s/map\_of\_to_list/list\_to\_map\_to\_list/g; s/map\_to\_of\_list/map\_to\_list\_to\_map/g; s/\bof\_list/list\_to\_set/g; s/\bof\_option/option\_to\_set/g; s/elem\_of\_of\_list/elem\_of\_list\_to\_set/g; s/elem\_of\_of\_option/elem\_of\_option\_to\_set/g; s/collection\_not\_subset\_inv/set\_not\_subset\_inv/g; s/seq\_set/set\_seq/g; s/collections/sets/g; s/collection/set/g; ' -i $(find -name "*.v") ```
-
- Jan 29, 2019
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Jan 23, 2019
-
-
Maxime Dénès authored
This is in preparation for coq/coq#9274.
-
- Jun 20, 2018
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- Jun 18, 2018
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- Apr 09, 2018
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Apr 05, 2018
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This followed from discussions in https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/FP/iris-coq/merge_requests/134
-
- Mar 28, 2018
-
-
Dan Frumin authored
-
- Nov 20, 2017
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This one works for setoid rewriting under binders.
-
- Nov 09, 2017
-
-
Johannes Kloos authored
-
- Oct 28, 2017
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This way, we will be compabile with Iris's heap_lang, which puts ;; at level 100.
-
- Oct 27, 2017
-
-
Jacques-Henri Jourdan authored
-
- Sep 21, 2017
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This allows for more control over `Hint Mode`.
-
- Sep 17, 2017
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This provides significant robustness against looping type class search. As a consequence, at many places throughout the library we had to add additional typing information to lemmas. This was to be expected, since most of the old lemmas were ambiguous. For example: Section fin_collection. Context `{FinCollection A C}. size_singleton (x : A) : size {[ x ]} = 1. In this case, the lemma does not tell us which `FinCollection` with elements `A` we are talking about. So, `{[ x ]}` could not only refer to the singleton operation of the `FinCollection A C` in the section, but also to any other `FinCollection` in the development. To make this lemma unambigious, it should be written as: Lemma size_singleton (x : A) : size ({[ x ]} : C) = 1. In similar spirit, lemmas like the one below were also ambiguous: Lemma lookup_alter_None {A} (f : A → A) m i j : alter f i m !! j = None
m !! j = None. It is not clear which finite map implementation we are talking about. To make this lemma unambigious, it should be written as: Lemma lookup_alter_None {A} (f : A → A) (m : M A) i j : alter f i m !! j = None m !! j = None. That is, we have to specify the type of `m`.
-
- Sep 08, 2017
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
See also Coq bug #5712.
-
- Sep 06, 2017
-
-
Dan Frumin authored
-
- Apr 01, 2017
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This is needed to use coq-stdpp in developments with -type-in-type as set_unfold will otherwise unify with any hyp, causing the set_solver tactic to break.
-
- Mar 15, 2017
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Mar 09, 2017
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
To be consistent with Iris, see Iris commit 9ee62b3a.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Feb 16, 2017
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
To make it consistent with Forall_impl and map_Forall_impl. Also, put the premises in the same order as those lemmas.
-
- Feb 15, 2017
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Jan 31, 2017
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Ralf Jung authored
This patch was created using find -name *.v | xargs -L 1 awk -i inplace '{from = 0} /^From/{ from = 1; ever_from = 1} { if (from == 0 && seen == 0 && ever_from == 1) { print "Set Default Proof Using \"Type*\"."; seen = 1 } }1 ' and some minor manual editing
-
- Nov 29, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Nov 23, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Nov 21, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Nov 20, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Oct 03, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Sep 20, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This also solves a name clash with the extension order of CMRAs.
-