It used to be: (P ={E}=> Q) := (True ⊢ (P → |={E}=> Q))
Now it is: (P ={E}=> Q) := (P ⊢ |={E}=> Q)

Rationale: to make the code closer to what is on paper, I want the notations
to look like quantifiers, i.e. have a binder built-in. I thus introduced the
following notations:

  [★ map] k ↦ x ∈ m, P
  [★ set] x ∈ X, P

The good thing - contrary to the notations that we had before that required an
explicit lambda - is that type annotations of k and x are now not printed
making goals much easier to read.

To do so, we have introduced the specialization patterns:

  =>[H1 .. Hn] and =>[-H1 .. Hn]

That generate a goal in which the view shift is preserved. These specialization
patterns can also be used for e.g. iApply.

Note that this machinery is not tied to primitive view shifts, and works for
various kinds of goal (as captured by the ToAssert type class, which describes
how to transform the asserted goal based on the main goal).

TODO: change the name of these specialization patterns to reflect this
generality.

Changes:
- We no longer have a different syntax for specializing a term H : P -★ Q whose
  range P or domain Q is persistent. There is just one syntax, and the system
  automatically determines whether either P or Q is persistent.
- While specializing a term, always modalities are automatically stripped. This
  gets rid of the specialization pattern !.
- Make the syntax of specialization patterns more consistent. The syntax for
  generating a goal is [goal_spec] where goal_spec is one of the following:

    H1 .. Hn : generate a goal using hypotheses H1 .. Hn
   -H1 .. Hn : generate a goal using all hypotheses but H1 .. Hn
           # : generate a goal for the premise in which all hypotheses can be
               used. This is only allowed when specializing H : P -★ Q where
               either P or Q is persistent.
           % : generate a goal for a pure premise.

And make constants P for which we do not want of_val P to reduce Opaque.

iSpecialize and iDestruct.

These tactics now all take an iTrm, which is a tuple consisting of
a.) a lemma or name of a hypotheses b.) arguments to instantiate
c.) a specialization pattern.

These tactics are superfluous:
- iPure H as pat => iDestruct H as pat
- iPersistent H => iSpecialize H "!"

- It can now also frame under later.
- Better treatment of evars, it now won't end up in loops whenever the goal
  involves sub-formulas ?P and it trying to apply all framing rules eagerly.
- It no longer delta expands while framing.
- Better clean up of True sub-formulas after a successful frame. For example,
  framing "P" in "▷ ▷ P ★ Q" yields just "Q" instead of "▷ True ★ Q" or so.

Par is now defined as an expression of type [∀ X, expr X] (instead of a
value) and we prove that it is stable under weakening and substitution.

It is just a test case and not really part of the barrier library.

This gets rid of the (ambiguous) notation %l, because we can declare
LitLoc as a coercion. It also shortens the code.

That way, we do not have useless type annotations of the form
"v : language.val heap_lang" cluttering about any goal.

Note, that we could decide to eta expand everywhere (as we do for ∀
and ∃), and use the notation "WP e {{ Q }}" for "wp e ⊤ (λ _, Q)".

It is not a library; it does not contain code, but instead is a core
part of heap_lang.

This reverts commit 3cc38ff6.

The reverted pure hypotheses and variables appear in the wrong order.

Since strip_later is doing a good job stripping laters in the conclusion,
these tactics are thus no longer needed. Also, wp_finish now properly
converts the result in a primitive viewshift in case it is not a weakestpre.

Also remove some superfluous map_ prefixes.